Stocks - Twitter (TWTR) has done basically nothing in its entire publically-traded history |
- Twitter (TWTR) has done basically nothing in its entire publically-traded history
- How would you feel about the stock market being open 24/7?
- Wall Street Week Ahead for the trading week beginning May 3rd, 2021
- CLOV hype and those hyping it.
- Financial Post had a great piece on WELL Health this morning
- The American Jobs Plan, How it Will be Paid, and What it Means for the Stock Market
- European investor: Small cap value & opinion about allocation
- Let's talk II-VI Inc. ($IIVI)
- Short volume on stock tickers
- All this talk of overvaluation... OK, where SHOULD the S&P be now and when will present valuation be fair?
- What brokerage that works in the EU would you recommend for investing in funds like the Vanguard VOO?
- Annual expected retunr of ETF-based portfolio
- Oil play for the summer
- I find earnings and estimates aren't always moving prices in the same direction.
- Cash holding question. How much %
- Waste Management (NYSE: $WM) stock DD i wrote for a discord I'm in
- Interested to know what others are buying?
- What affect do stock offerings have on support levels?
- Thoughts on CCL for the Summer...
- Query regarding selling shares?
- Which FAAMG stocks do you think have the most potential 5-10 years?
- About 87% of Companies in the S&P have beaten analyst estimates, set to be the higgest beat rate on record since 1994
Twitter (TWTR) has done basically nothing in its entire publically-traded history Posted: 02 May 2021 08:44 AM PDT I started investing in late 2013 and TWTR was the hot IPO at the time. I distinctly remember buying a few shares at $57 figuring I'd get in on the ground floor of what was already a culturally-significant company. Amazingly, over 7 years later the stock is trading lower than where I bought it all those years ago. TWTR has never paid a dividend or split their stock, so in effect they've created zero wealth for the general public over their entire public existence. I sold my shares for a wash in 2014, but I'd have been shocked to hear they'd still be kicking around the same spot in 2021. In an era of social media, digital advertising and general tech dominance, it's a remarkable failure. On the one hand it provides a valuable lesson that a company still has to succeed financially, and not just have a compelling narrative. Pay attention to the bottom line - hype alone does not a business make. On the other hand, what the hell? Twitter has created verbs. It's among the most-visited websites in the world. We've just had 4 years of a Twitter presidency. Yet Twitter has seen its younger brother (SQ) lap it in terms of value. How has this company not managed to get off the ground as a profitable business? [link] [comments] |
How would you feel about the stock market being open 24/7? Posted: 02 May 2021 08:12 AM PDT So, I've had a thought recently about how it would be if the market was open 24/7. I think there would be sufficient liquidity for most of the time; the US market is one of the most extensive and prominent in the world. In fact, I live in the UK and I actually like the US market more than the UK one, due to the stocks and the reliability of it. So, since there's always global demand, I think we'll have constant trading happening no matter the time. However, I enjoy the feeling of being able to sleep without the risk of waking up and seeing some stock has crashed 20% overnight. I'm personally in favour of keeping the market with distinct opening and closing times, but I wanted to hear other people's opinions on it. [link] [comments] |
Wall Street Week Ahead for the trading week beginning May 3rd, 2021 Posted: 02 May 2021 04:45 AM PDT Goooooood Sunday morning to all of you here on r/stocks. I hope everyone on this sub made out pretty nicely in the market this past week, and is ready for the new trading week ahead. Here is everything you need to know to get you ready for the trading week beginning May 3rd, 2021. More earnings, April's big jobs report and inflation worries could swing markets in the week ahead - (Source)
This past week saw the following moves in the S&P:(CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL S&P TREE MAP FOR THE PAST WEEK!)S&P Sectors for this past week:(CLICK HERE FOR THE S&P SECTORS FOR THE PAST WEEK!)Major Indices for this past week:(CLICK HERE FOR THE MAJOR INDICES FOR THE PAST WEEK!)Major Futures Markets as of Friday's close:(CLICK HERE FOR THE MAJOR FUTURES INDICES AS OF FRIDAY!)Economic Calendar for the Week Ahead:(CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL ECONOMIC CALENDAR FOR THE WEEK AHEAD!)Percentage Changes for the Major Indices, WTD, MTD, QTD, YTD as of Friday's close:(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART!)S&P Sectors for the Past Week:(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART!)Major Indices Pullback/Correction Levels as of Friday's close:(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART!)Major Indices Rally Levels as of Friday's close:(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART!)Most Anticipated Earnings Releases for this week:(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART!)Here are the upcoming IPO's for this week:(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART!)Friday's Stock Analyst Upgrades & Downgrades:(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART LINK #1!)(CLICK HERE FOR THE CHART LINK #2!)
(CLICK HERE FOR NEXT WEEK'S MOST NOTABLE EARNINGS RELEASES!)(CLICK HERE FOR NEXT WEEK'S HIGHEST VOLATILITY EARNINGS RELEASES!)(CLICK HERE FOR THE MOST ANTICIPATED EARNINGS RELEASES BEFORE MONDAY'S MARKET OPEN!)Below are some of the notable companies coming out with earnings releases this upcoming trading week ahead which includes the date/time of release & consensus estimates courtesy of Earnings Whispers:
DISCUSS!What are you all watching for in this upcoming trading week?
I hope you all have a wonderful Sunday and a great trading week ahead r/stocks. [link] [comments] |
CLOV hype and those hyping it. Posted: 02 May 2021 11:11 AM PDT CLOV might be the greatest play in the history of investments. However, I've started looking at the comment history of some of the profiles hyping this stock and it's all comments that have come in the past couple of months, and all of them are devoted to CLOV stock jumping. No additional comments, no additional interests. Granted, I haven't looked at 100% of the CLOV OPs, but I have looked at 5 or 6 and none of them have cake days prior to Jan 1, 2021 and none of them have comments about anything but CLOV. It's entirely possible there's nothing to see here and this is perfectly normal... but I have to ask those wiser than me who would benefit if shares of CLOV were snatched up? Who would want a reduction in float for CLOV shares? Is this a squeeze in the making and who would or could start hyping the stock to gin up the price and lower the available shares? These aren't leading questions, I would sincerely like to hear from those who understand this better than I do. [link] [comments] |
Financial Post had a great piece on WELL Health this morning Posted: 01 May 2021 06:10 PM PDT Most analysts I have ever seen respond to a short report... https://financialpost.com/investing/short-sellers-dont-always-win-and-shouldnt-get-the-glory Really sheds light on the current market we are in. " If you own a great company their is no reason to worry" . Excited to see what this company does in its future. [link] [comments] |
The American Jobs Plan, How it Will be Paid, and What it Means for the Stock Market Posted: 02 May 2021 11:06 AM PDT Here's some charts that distribute the allocations of President Biden's $2T Infrastructure Plan or American Jobs Plan. Dollar value is approximate. Since r/stocks doesn't allow images to be upload, you will have to see all my sub-par looking charts here. More details on how the American Jobs Plan...
Who is going to pay for this? We the people. Well more like we the 1%ers. And corporations. Again, I made more charts to visualize it a bit better. So unless you're a high earner, this won't affect you (much). I made these charts about a week or two ago but I heard for the American Families Plan, individuals earning more than $452,700 and married couples earning more than $509,300 (meaning each partners could earn less than $400,000) could see a tax increase. What do you mean, "won't affect you (much)"? If there's tax increases for the rich, what will the rich do? They'll take their stock market gains before the tax increases. 2020 saw huge gains so we may see a correction in the coming months. How much of a correction you ask? I don't know but I would guess 10-15% in the broader market. More if you're into speculative high growth stocks. I say that because I know a lot of you have positions on them. Careful how you invest these next few months. And if there's tax increases for corporations, obviously they'll do whatever they can to avoid them. However even a 1% increase in their taxes (note below I mention that many corporations pay very little taxes because of loopholes) will affect their bottom line. This means earnings will be less and therefore lower stock valuations. So if the rich sell and corporations are being taxed more, how will that affect the stock market?
*In 2018, Goldman Sachs did a study that showed 100% of their ETFs did not pay capital gains. Broadly, 90% of ETFs did not pay capital gains compared to 39% of mutual funds.
What does history say about stock market performance after tax increases? "In the 13 previous instances of tax increases just since 1950, the S&P 500, the stock index that tracks most of the major companies in the US, has shown higher average returns, and higher odds of an advance, in times when taxes are increasing, according to Chisholm's research, which analyzed the data in the calendar year of the tax changes, plus the year prior and year after. This pattern holds true even when you drill down into key sectors of the S&P 500." Here's a chart of the S&P500 performance after tax increases. Not too bad eh? What's happening now with the current tax law?
The Made in America Tax plan
So what should I do to prepare if this bill passes? Nothing different honestly. Keep investing. DCA - dollar cost average if your stocks drop. Stay the course in your high conviction names. De-risk if you have to by investing in safer investments like index funds or ETFs. I know a lot of you are into SPAX (special purpose acquisition companies. I spelled it this way in case this sub banned the real acronym) and other speculative companies. There's almost 500 of them out there. 217 of those were from 2020. To be honest, 1% of those companies will moon. Most of them won't see a return for years. Are you willing to hold them without knowing they will moon in 5-10 years? Some may not even make a return. Make sure you understand market conditions. Stocks really do go up but its only the ones that are backed by strong earnings and potential. Don't get burned. Money is not everything but it's a tool to bring you financial freedom sooner in life. You know what they say, "there's only two things guaranteed in life: death and taxes". [link] [comments] |
European investor: Small cap value & opinion about allocation Posted: 02 May 2021 01:19 PM PDT Hi all After watching Ben Felix on YouTube I have decided to include small cap value ETFs in my portfolio. Small cap values are likely to outperform growth ETFs in the long run. I am thinking about the following (I am in Europe) IWDA 40% ZPRV 20% ZPRX 10% EMIM 10% IS3R 20% What do you think? [link] [comments] |
Posted: 02 May 2021 06:40 AM PDT So I recently came across this company which looked quite interesting to me, given the large variety of usecases for their technologies in growing sectors. I'll try myself at a little writeup to provide some context and serve as a basis for discussion. I'd love to get some opinions and CC from more experienced traders, since this is my first time researching a stock. So IIVI defines itself as follows:
Their customers are names like Apple, Facebook and Boeing, among others. Looking at their financials, they seem to be doing alright. Given their numerous acquisitions, with a pretty significant recent purchase of Coherent (COHR), an increase in revenue as well as accumulating debt mid-term is to be expected. (data taken from yahoo finance)
but also increasing debt, and a relatively bad 2020, with a negative EPS of -0.79. As mentioned, IIVI has recently acquired COHR, rendering them the leader in the laser technology sector. The closing price of IIVI was 67$ on friday, which is a 33% discount from ATH. They had dropped previsously during the COHR acquisition bidding wars, but had temporarily recovered up to 83$ after winning them. Current downwards movement is likely caused by uncertainty regarding their upcoming earnings call on May 6th. I see potential for a pretty decent recovery mid- to long-term, granted that currently the growth and innovative tech sectors are not looking to hot. Thanks for reading, and please do feel free to drop your opinions on the stock and this post :) [link] [comments] |
Posted: 02 May 2021 06:00 AM PDT I feel it's unfair for shorts to have all the data to make a valued pick for shorting, they have our volume, 52 week high/low. Daily high/low and loads of other information. However, the only thing we don't get in return is short volume and a constant idea of what it is. We have to look at dark pools, look at the 15 day old report of short interest. It's highly unfair that bulls are getting shafted. Shorts can buy on leverage, bulls gotta pay full price. [link] [comments] |
Posted: 02 May 2021 01:46 PM PDT There's been a lot of "correction" or "market crash" talk the last few days (heck, even at W S B they are talking about it). So anyway, if the market is overvalued, then at what S&P index price would it NOT be overvalued? 4000? 3750? 3500? And after how many years (other things being equal) would it take for the present ~4150 valuation to—in fact—be fairly valued? [link] [comments] |
Posted: 02 May 2021 09:56 AM PDT I've been using Revolut for trading stocks but I want to start putting money into Index funds and ETFs to save up for later in life. Doesn't have to be VOO specifically but I've read a few threads on here about good funds but they recommend Fidelity and Vanguard ones like that one for S&P500. Unfortunately neither of those platforms are available in the EU so I was wondering if any brokerages here offered these or similar ones to put money into? [link] [comments] |
Annual expected retunr of ETF-based portfolio Posted: 02 May 2021 08:56 AM PDT Hi all If I hold 3 ETFs A with allocation 50% B with allocation 30% C with allocation 20% and A, B, C have average annualized returns over the period of 10y as 10%, 11%, and 12% how can I estimate the average excepted return of my whole portfolio? Just as the average weighted returns? [link] [comments] |
Posted: 01 May 2021 09:53 PM PDT Goldman Sachs is predicting that the oil price can hit 80 after summer reopening. Which of the ETF's are good for short term play and tracks oil price? Or companies like XOM or BP will be good for 3-4 months? [link] [comments] |
I find earnings and estimates aren't always moving prices in the same direction. Posted: 02 May 2021 09:16 AM PDT I find earning reports and whether businesses beat estimates don't always move prices in the same direction. In fact they act like news sometimes, i.e. going opposite direction. Can anyone recall any research done before that correlates earnings and price movement post announcement? [link] [comments] |
Cash holding question. How much % Posted: 02 May 2021 10:19 AM PDT Hello I'm kind of new into investing. Since October 1st. I had 25k so i invested all of it and glad i did. Yup over 15 percent. But i rent to be prepared for a downturn, and when a few stocks dropped hard in February i had no cash to buy more So I'm building a cash reserve in my stock accounts so i can click and but instantly if needed. I invest 500 to 800 a month. So should i not buy any stocks until i have 5k in cash. Then keeping 20 percent aside, therefore buy 500 in stocks and 200 in cash each month. Or is it a waste? Thank you [link] [comments] |
Waste Management (NYSE: $WM) stock DD i wrote for a discord I'm in Posted: 01 May 2021 07:10 PM PDT When searching for a company to do a DD on this week for this Discord, I initially was struggling to land on a company. There are just so many dividend growth companies on my watchlist that I didn't know where to start. Initially I was wanting to do a write up on HanesBrands, ticker $HBI, due to everyone needing underwear and socks but then I realized I hadn't put on underwear since I got home from work on Friday, so I just couldn't bring myself to break that streak to product test this company as thoroughly as I would have liked. However, this did lead me to throwing away some older underwear from the back of my drawer and having to race out to get them in the bin before the truck picked up this morning. Funnily enough, it was this little act that led me down the rabbit hole of America's first, largest, and objectively best waste management company, $WM. This write up will attempt to go over some of the reasons I view $WM as a prime choice for any dividend growth investor who is seeking to add to their industrial holdings by buying a company worth holding for 20+ years, including some basic financial information, how WM can grow into the future, as well as some potential problems with the stock that I see. Finally I am not a financial advisor and this is written purely for the purpose of sharing some publicly available stock info in the form of a poorly written, weed induced WM DD, I hope you enjoy. The aptly named Waste Management, ticker symbol $WM, is an industrial sector powerhouse with first mover-advantage specializing in the waste management sub-sector that has been slowly and steadily raising its dividend over the last 18 years. Waste Management operates primarily with four different revenue streams consisting of waste collection, landfill operations, waste transportation, and finally, recycling. It is with these four primary sources of revenue that allow $WM to boast a current dividend yield of 1.68% with a yearly dividend of $2.30 paid out quarterly in March, June, September, and December. This dividend represents a payout ratio of only 53% which is not very high at all and is actually very sustainable. In fact, it has a dividend safety score of 98 from simplysafedividends.com and is over where management is aiming for their dividend to be (between 40-50% according to their 2020 Investors day presentation.) In addition to being very sustainable, a payout ratio of 53% also leaves room for growth, and $WM has been doing just that. While it's 4 year average dividend yield is just slightly higher at 1.98% compared to todays at 1.68% the amount that yield represents has been growing at an average rate of 41.46% over the last 5 years, 28.24% over the last 3 years, and even in the shitstorm that was 2020, WM raised its dividend by 6.34% just showing that this company not only cares about it's dividend growth, but that it can easily afford to raise its dividend as one important thing to note is that during the last 18 years (since 2004) of consistent dividend increases, the payout ratio has more or less remained unchanged, maintaining managements preferred 40-50% payout ratio with occasional outbreaks such as where we are currently due to a contagious outbreak that rocked the entire world. Finally, Waste Management has a Current Price of ≅ $138, an analyst price range of $125-$160, and an average analyst price target of $144 showing some room for this stock to still raise or fall to a better entry point if it does fall to test the lower analysts prediction. Moving on from the dividend and surface level stock price breakdowns, $WM has a current P/E ratio of 37.7 and I know this might seem very high, it actually isn't when you compare it to other waste management companies. For instance, WM's next three largest competitors are Republic Services, with a P/E of 35.2, Clean Harbor, with a P/E of 36.7, and Waste Connections, which has a huge P/E of 141.13 (this is the only one of the three that I went and checked multiple sites and yes, it really is that big...) As you can see, a P/E ratio in the low to mid 30's basically comes with the territory of being in the waste management sub-sector. Just as the P/E ratio comes with the sub-sector; growth in the form of acquisitions will almost always bring some additional debt as its +1, and this is the next aspect of $WM's balance sheet that I want to touch on. In 2019 Waste Management achieved a major milestone for any company, it officially made enough to fully pay down it's yearly short term debt and pay off future long term debt, an achievement it had not completed since at least 2016 (and possibly before but this is the furthest back I could find regarding short term debt payments). Regardless, this is still an important feat as it shows that $WM is making enough money to support not only a growing dividend, but also additional amounts of debt to fund new acquisitions now and in the future. Now how can I make the claim that they can afford to take even more debt on? Well in 2020 (yeah the shitiest of shity years for businesses) $WM paid off all their short term debt and an additional $7.8 Billion in long term debt as well, just showing the strength of it's balance sheet and how the acquisitions it's made are paying off in time. Finally the last bit of financial digging I did resulted in me coming across something that did cause me to pause and I feel that any decent DD should include some potential negatives to put the positives into a better, more complete light. The elephant in the room in regards to Waste Management is it's unusually high P/B ratio of 7.7ish. While this ratio is generally not as important in the industrial waste management compared to say the financial sector, it is still important to compare it to its peers. The same three competitors mentioned above all have lower P/B ratios than $WM. Ultimately this just means it is slightly overpriced compared to its book value, this can be explained away simply by the fact that in 2019, seeing that it could pay off all it's short term debt, Waste Management added a large amount of debt to its balance sheet so that it could buy new acquisitions, one such acquisition was Advanced Disposal for 4.6 Billion. This higher P/B ratio also explains Morningstars 2 star rating. However my response to this information is just this: If you plan to buy and hold a stock for 20 years, isn't it better to open your position early, accrue dividends and price appreciation, while buying dips, than to just wait for its P/B ratio to dip down to a level you're more comfortable with? Especially considering that there is a very good chance that as the debt goes down as the acquisitions begin paying for themselves, so too will the P/B ratio fall. Moving on from financials and more towards hard assets, Waste Managements true strength starts to take form as it truly lives up to what one imagines from a company with first-mover advantage in its respective sub-sector. The company services over 20 million residential and 2 million commercial customers in 48 US States, Canada, DC, and Puerto Rico. $WM has a total of 293 active landfills with an average remaining lifespan of 22 years per landfill. They also have 346 waste transfer/consolidation stations, 146 recycling centers making it the largest recycling network in the nation , 16 waste to energy facilities that burn up to 23,000 pounds of trash to generate up to 670 MW/hour of electrical/steam energy, enough to power 660,000 homes. Waste Management also boasts 4 new Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) facilities that have already created more than 16 million gallons of RNG since coming online. This is enough RNG to power 1/3 of their 26,000 strong fleet and sell the remaining to local energy companies that then use the RNG to power roughly 460,000 homes. Finally every other landfill that WM owns and operates that isn't a special waste-to-energy or RNG facility also has some more basic ways to capture the methane that comes naturally with decomposing trash and sells that to local gas-to-energy companies that use the supplied methane to help power an additional 180,000 homes per year, bringing the total number of homes powered by trash to a whopping 1.3 million and WM only plans to raise that number to over 2 million in the coming years. The last aspect of Waste Management that I want to discuss is their future growth prospects and why I am bullish on them as a company overall despite the higher than average P/B ratio the company currently has. Everyone creates waste and we all need that waste taken away somewhere so that we can live the normal lives we have become accustomed to. In addition to being the largest, the first, and objectively the best waste management company, $WM is also investing heavily into renewable energy by harnessing the naturally occurring methane and other RNG's that are simply by-products of their primary business. In addition to selling the naturally produced energy that they found themselves having on their hands, $WM has also found a way to make money off of full and capped landfills by taking advantage of existing power lines that run to and from local electrical infrastructure turning them into solar farms and boosting the local power supply. Waste Management is also currently undergoing a change in it's payment model, a shift away from a flat rate bundled model that didn't take into account the costs of processing and holding the waste $WM picks up, and is changing to a fee-for-service model which will take into account everything from pick-up to transport, to recycling to even the costs it takes to turn that waste into energy. This move will essentially turn every action $WM takes into a way to make money. By providing such an essential service that no-one is exempt from needing, $WM has positioned itself amazingly to continue being the industry leader in waste management for decades to come. And that is no understatement, Waste Management has proven to be a very sticky company with a customer typically being a customer for 10+ years. The final aspect of $WM's growth potential I want to dig up hits closer to home for me and those in Texas than others, and that is Waste Management basically has a monopoly in Texas. Yes there are competitors here, but between being headquartered in Houston which is the 4th largest city in the nation and rapidly growing, and having cornered the market in the new silicon valley cities of San Antonio and Austin, $WM can rest easily knowing they have future customers for years to come. Overall I am extremely bullish on Waste Management and see this as an investment to hold for the 25 to 30 years I have left until retirement and honestly, with $WM I might get to retirement early, and while investing in trash might not be a dirty job, as someone who grew up watch Mike Rowe, I think it's only fitting that I make my portfolio get a little dirty to make money. [link] [comments] |
Interested to know what others are buying? Posted: 02 May 2021 10:32 AM PDT Hi, guys, I created investing web application/resource for people to anonymously share what they are buying on the marketing. This resource would help me and others see what stocks are currently being bought and may help trigger some investment decisions. Everything is totally anonymous! Of course make sure to do your DD! Link: https://globalstockbuyerviewer.herokuapp.com/ Please take down this post if not allowed. Thanks! Although I know there are some flaws feel free to comment on what needs to be improved/added. All feedback is appreciated! [link] [comments] |
What affect do stock offerings have on support levels? Posted: 02 May 2021 12:36 PM PDT Say Company XYZ completes a stock offering and issues the new shares at $50. Obviously offerings are theoretically dilutive, but my thought is that since so much (presumably largely institutional) money was spent buying the stock at its offering price that there would be willingness to buy again at/around that price. Am I off base? [link] [comments] |
Thoughts on CCL for the Summer... Posted: 02 May 2021 11:57 AM PDT I am thinking about summer Calls and buying shares for CCL. I wanted to see what others are thinking about the stock. One thought I had was the fact that they scrapped a lot of ships early in the pandemic. Will this cause a problem for them if demand rises? I think so. [link] [comments] |
Query regarding selling shares? Posted: 02 May 2021 04:47 AM PDT Hi guys, quick Q. My mum inherited shares a number of years ago and is looking to offload them now. We are confused with how much we can sell them for; it says ordinary shares = 0.027p but on the LSE it says 113p. Can someone shed some light? Thanks in advance 👍 [link] [comments] |
Which FAAMG stocks do you think have the most potential 5-10 years? Posted: 01 May 2021 06:38 PM PDT Not asking for recommendations but curious to hear thoughts. FAAMG, as Goldman Sachs defines as Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Google, (Not to be confused with Jim Cramer's FAANG, which substitutes Netflix for Microsoft) have been among the most dominant players in terms of growth, volume and market cap. All of them have an arguably strong role to play in our society in the many years to come. I am curious to hear if anyone is particularly bullish or bearish on the outlook for any of these mammoth companies? Some focus questions: Do you think either of them are particularly positioned to dominate a new sector? Have some grown so large that they will stagnant from here? Do some now face legal risks because of alleged anti-competitiveness? [link] [comments] |
Posted: 01 May 2021 04:36 PM PDT Article for those who want to scroll through quickly: U.S. companies are leaping above expectations on first-quarter earnings, giving investors stronger confirmation that profit growth will be able to support the market this year. A big piece of that growth is coming once again from technology and growth companies, which suggests greater durability in companies that underperformed more economically focused value names for months. Earnings are rebounding from last year's pandemic-fueled lows. With results in from more than half of the S&P 500 companies, earnings are now expected to have risen 46% in the first quarter from the previous year, compared with forecasts of 24% growth at the start of the month, according to IBES data from Refinitiv. About 87% of reports have come in ahead of analysts' estimates for earnings per share, putting the quarter on track to have the highest beat rate on record going back to 1994, when Refinitiv began tracking the data. Some strategists say the stronger-than-expected earnings could drive a richly valued market higher still. The benchmark S&P 500 (.SPX) is trading at about 23 times forward earnings, above the long-average of about 15, based on Refinitiv's data. "The earnings results are really not being fully priced in yet, and that's because you're seeing estimates for the back half of the year start to pick up now in response to this better-than expected environment. That says to us there's still more room," said Eric Freedman, chief investment officer at U.S. Bank Wealth Management. The high percentage of beats also follows many quarters where companies were holding off on giving guidance on the future, making it harder for analysts to estimate results for this year. Citing stronger earnings, Jonathan Golub, chief U.S. equity strategist and head of quantitative research at Credit Suisse Securities, on Friday raised his 2021 S&P 500 price target to 4,600 from 4,300. The S&P 500 index (.SPX) was last at about 4,180. Stocks have had little reaction to results overall so far. The S&P 500 is up more than 11% since Dec. 31. The index is up less than 2% since mid-April when the earnings period kicked in to high gear, but remains near record highs. Earnings also are raising some fresh questions in the debate over growth versus value. After a decade of steadily under-performing the overall market, value has been a favorite among some investors as a bet on the reopening of the economy. However, "tech is showing an ability ... to still create as good, if not superior, sales growth to cyclicals. That's what I find amazing," said David Bianco, Americas chief investment officer for DWS. "Tech is as much as of a reopening play as everybody else," he said. Investors will be watching reports in the weeks ahead to see if the trend continues. Results are expected next week from a wide range of companies including Activision Blizzard (ATVI.O), Cummins Inc (CMI.N), ConocoPhillips (COP.N) and Pfizer Inc (PFE.N). The first-quarter results come after a months-long rally in value stocks as investors bet on the reopening of businesses as COVID-19 vaccines became more available. Value has outperformed growth names that include heavily weighted technology stocks, and for the year so far, the Russell 1000 value index (.RLV) remains up about 15%, while the Russell 1000 growth index (.RLG) is up about 8% in that time. Technology-related companies as well as banks - value trade favorites - have had the largest percentage point contribution to estimated first-quarter S&P 500 earnings, with JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Apple Inc (AAPL.O) at the top of the list, based on Refinitiv's data. Tech (.SPLRCT) is also among the strongest sectors for year-over-year sales growth for the quarter, Bianco noted. While the risks of higher inflation and possibly higher taxes have given some investors reason to become more cautious on growth shares, earnings may make them think twice about avoiding the group. "It pays for a lot of investors to be balanced between value and growth," said Sameer Samana, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute in St. Louis. "We're actually carving out a third group ... defensives," he said, adding that those are the areas for investors to avoid for now. Its hard to find a bearish view on the current market situation when so many companies are beating earnings. Maybe in the short term we'll see some volatility as we finish getting through earnings season, but I don't think we'll see much more falling, if any. [link] [comments] |
You are subscribed to email updates from Stocks - Investing and trading for all. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment