Stocks - r/Stocks Daily Discussion Wednesday - Sep 29, 2021 |
- r/Stocks Daily Discussion Wednesday - Sep 29, 2021
- Wtf is going on with the market?
- $GGPI - EV company backed by Leonardo DiCaprio with over 20k cars delivered and $1.6B revenue this year to go public DD
- Here's Your Daily Market Brief For September 29th
- How do i begin searching for companies to invest in?
- Here is a Market Recap for today Wednesday, Sept 29, 2021
- Should you invest in the most reputable brands in the world? - Benchmarking performance of the worlds most reputable brands against S&P500
- Selling calls or puts that will not hit to make 100% gain
- ASML Dropping?
- My China Bear Case (More than just Evergrande)
- can employee of a company receive shares of a company from someone outside?
- Babcock - Great British Defence Recovery stock
- At what price will AMD see support? Reasonable entry price?
- $TAK or $NVO BO of $MIRM?
- PLTR has won a 2 year contract, worth 58 mil. dollars, with the National Institutes of Health
- Market fluctuates but fed/house/senate will not let the market crash
- I just found this interesting bit of news. Hope it helps!
- Non-tech ETF help.
- I have $60k in CD funds. Should I withdraw early to put it into an ETF?
- Secret projects Apple is working on over the next 10 years:
- Airline Stock LEAPS
- Why is BGFV being shorted?
| r/Stocks Daily Discussion Wednesday - Sep 29, 2021 Posted: 29 Sep 2021 02:30 AM PDT These daily discussions run from Monday to Friday including during our themed posts. Some helpful links:
If you have a basic question, for example "what is EPS," then google "investopedia EPS" and click the investopedia article on it; do this for everything until you have a more in depth question or just want to share what you learned. Please discuss your portfolios in the Rate My Portfolio sticky.. See our past daily discussions here. Also links for: Technicals Tuesday, Options Trading Thursday, and Fundamentals Friday. [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Wtf is going on with the market? Posted: 29 Sep 2021 09:15 AM PDT Everything I own is nosediving. I've never been a panic seller but Holy crap am I starting to panic. I'm already at a huge loss and I've run into some bad financial luck so I'm just struggling all around. Any advice? [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 29 Sep 2021 06:57 AM PDT GGPI is bringing Polestar public, which is a swedish electric vehicle company that has ACTUAL REVENUE from vehicle sales worldwide! They have delivered well over 20,000 vehicles so far, and they are projected to have a revenue of $1.6B this year. Here you can see some sales data from Europe, not included are the sales in China and North America: https://www.polestar-forum.com/threads/polestar-european-sales.573/post-66880 The table shows the numbers in million SEK, Polestar did $636 million USD in revenue in 2020 which is slated to grow by 151% in 2021 to $1.6B: https://imgur.com/PpSpkrX That's BEFORE the release of the Polestar 3, their new SUV which will be "made in the USA" in Ridgeville, NC, as well as their 4th model which is the Polestar Precept. It is a full-size electric sedan comparable to an S-Class or the Lucid Air in size: https://www.elektroauto-news.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DSCF2201a.jpg Guggenheim Partners is a massive investment bank with over $250B AUM. They are well-known within the industry with a great reputation. Ever heard of the Guggenheim Museum for modern art in New York? They belong to the big boys club. Upside: I am pretty sure you guys know that LCID is trading at $42B and Rivian is looking to IPO at $80B this year. Together they have delivered 0 vehicles to their customers, Polestar is going public at $20B at $10 per share. You can do your own math but I am pretty confident a 50% upside or $30B marketcap are realistic for this company. There are good arguments why this should be worth more than Lucid but I am not starting to argue about that. MY POSITION: 12,150 shares and 100 calls of different strikes and expiries. If you want to check out the customer feedback you may go to r/Polestar I feel people over there actually bought the cars and seem honest about pros/cons. [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Here's Your Daily Market Brief For September 29th Posted: 29 Sep 2021 05:24 AM PDT Top News
Price Target Updates
In Other News
[link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| How do i begin searching for companies to invest in? Posted: 29 Sep 2021 06:46 AM PDT What is the first thing i should do if i want to find new companies to invest in? I was lucky in finding a small cap company a few months back and made a profit from selling its shares recently because it turned out great but now i can't seem to do it again. How should i go about finding these companies? I have always thought of it as just simply google searching but i feel that there's more to it than that and would like to get advice on where should i begin. Thanks [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Here is a Market Recap for today Wednesday, Sept 29, 2021 Posted: 29 Sep 2021 01:21 PM PDT PsychoMarket Recap - Wednesday, September 29, 2021 After suffering one of the worst days all year yesterday, stocks stabilized today, with the three major indexes trading modestly green as Treasury yields pulled back from multi-month highs. Lots of dynamics affecting the market right, with market participants closely monitoring developments out of Washington D.C, communications from the Fed, and ongoing situations in China. Yesterday, the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield spiked to as much as 1.56%, the highest level since June, which pressured tech stocks, causing the Nasdaq (QQQ) to fall by more than 2.5% yesterday. Rising Treasury yields hurt high-growth stocks, like technology, the most because these companies require a lot of capital to fund their growth and expansion and generate most of their cash and earnings years down the road. Future cash decreases in today's dollars as rates increase partly because investors have more opportunities to earn bigger returns from assets paying higher interest and dividends right now. While higher yields are generally seen as a bet on a strengthening economic environment, it does make it more expensive to borrow capital, which weighs heavily on growth stocks, which are valued heavily based on future earnings projections. Timothy Chubb, Chief Investment Officer at advisory firm Girard, said "Yesterday's selloff was really largely driven by rate movement. It wasn't necessarily the size of the rate movement, but the speed that it took place." The yield gained more than 16 basis points from its low last Friday to yesterday's peak. Congress members continue to race in order to pass legislation to fund the government until next year and prevent the government from defaulting and shutting down, which Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warning the US must raise the debt limit by October 18 in order to avoid a default. This comes amid a backdrop of ongoing debates surrounding the bipartisan $1 trillion infrastructure deal. Last night, Republicans refused to pass a bill to avert a government shutdown and raise or suspend the debt limit to prevent the US from defaulting on its debts. Unfortunately, something that is fairly routine (the debt ceiling has been raised 80 times since 1960 and three times under President Trump, with the latest suspension in 2019) has become a headline with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell stating that he would not provide the Republican votes necessary. https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-congress-government-funding-e7bfe8a6ffdb40a8d33e17ef11ded7a7 Jason Grumet, Bipartisan Policy Center President, said "It is really important that we separate the shutdown, which is terrible, from the debt limit, which is catastrophic. There could be, I think, a very short shutdown of the government Friday night going into Saturday, Sunday. And I think that you would then see a short continuing resolution to get the government running again. The government shutdown really isn't the problem we're grappling with. The problem we're grappling with really is the debt ceiling. Democrats tried to join them together. That did not make the sale for Republicans. Some Democrats have a different approach to the debt ceiling. But I am not particularly concerned about a government shutdown." Penduing home sales have greatly exceed expectations in August, rebounding spectacularly from the July dip to jump to the highest level in seven-months. Pending home sales rose 8.1% in August month-on-month, according to the National Association of Realtors. This exceeded estimates for a 1.4% monthly rise, based on Bloomberg consensus data. In July, pending home sales fell by 2.0%. Pending home sales are -6.3% down compared to last year. Lawrence Yun, the NAR's Chief Economist, said "Rising inventory and moderating price conditions are bringing buyers back to the market. Affordability, however, remains challenging as home prices are roughly three times wage growth. Highlights
"In my view, the biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital. Not only is the mere drop in stock prices not risk, but it is an opportunity. Where else do you look for cheap stocks?" - Li Lu [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 29 Sep 2021 03:42 AM PDT Coke is just soda. Levi's are just jeans. The iPhone is just a phone. Yet, we go out of our ways to select certain brands over others - most of the time at a higher price [1]. Everyone knows the importance of reputation for a company. Highly reputable brands have multiple things going for them:
Basically, you can consider having a great reputation to be a positive feedback loop on steroids! In an economy where 70-80% of the market value of a company comes from intangible assets like brand equity, intellectual capital, and goodwill [2], reputations can make or break a company's performance. In one of my previous analyses, we had discovered and proved that the best companies to work for routinely beat the market in stock returns. So this week, let's see how the most reputed brands have performed over the last decade! Data While there are multiple companies that measure reputation, I chose the RepTrack list for my analysis as they seem to be the most established ones and have been creating their top 100 list for the last 2 decades. They base their study on more than 240K responders over 15+ countries and the rating tells us how the companies are regarded by the general public. They have multiple factors that go into the final ranking, but for this analysis, I am only considering the final rank of the company. I am considering the companies that were present in the Top 10 list at least once in the last decade [2012 - 2021] Analysis RepTrack publishes their result in March, every year. Since I could not find any fixed date of publication, for the purpose of the stock price calculation, I am using April 1st of every year as my investment date. Even though the company produces a Top 100 list, I have limited my analysis to the Top 10 companies [3]. We then calculate the stock returns generated by these companies [4] over various time periods (1-year, 3-years, 5-years & till date) and then compare it to our benchmark. [5] Results Return Comparison - SPY vs Top 10 - Most Reputable Brands
Companies in the most reputable list have consistently beaten SPY over different time periods. There is a significant improvement in overall return when holding the investment for a longer-term. My hypothesis here is that, even though the short-term returns can be affected by market cycles, over the long run, companies having a great reputation end up outperforming their peers, and this is reflected in their stock price. Another interesting insight we can derive from the data is the performance of the top-10 companies in each year's list. As we can see, the most reputable brands beat SPY by a considerable margin in 7/10 years [6]. Limitations to the Analysis There are some limitations to the above analysis that you should be aware of before trying to replicate the strategy.
Whether you like it or not, brands seem to have a significant impact on our daily lives. Just think about the number of times you/your friend have sworn by a brand and recommended it to everyone [8]. Almost all the brands in the top 10 list (eg. Rolex, Ferrari, Adidas, Harley-Davidson) have users that are extremely loyal, willing to pay a premium, and acts as unofficial spokespersons for the company. Our analysis, in turn, proves that all these positive factors cause the company to outperform the market! So now you know what to do next time when your friend is swearing by a brand. Until next week… Google Sheet containing all the data used for analysis: Here Footnotes and Existing Research [1] This great video by Big Think showcases how Apple and Nike have spent billions of dollars for creating a positive brand image in our brains and most of us, in the end, are not rational customers. [2] Reputation and Its Risks - Harvard Business Review [3] The main reason for stopping with the Top 10 is the manual data pull process. They do not give a stock ticker associated with the stock nor is the list easily parsable. Given we are pulling data for 10 years, I limited myself to the top 10 companies. [4] A stock is only considered if it's directly investable from the US market and is an independent company (Examples of companies ignored - Rolex, LEGO Group, and Bosch) [5] Before you come at me with Pitchforks for using S&P 500 instead of Nasdaq Composite, please take a look at the list of companies. It's from a wide variety of industries. Adding to this, even though tech provided the majority of returns, starting in 2012, you would not have any idea about the tech run we would be having over the next decade. [6] I don't think 2020 and 2021 should be counted here due to two reasons. First, it's not enough time as we can see from the first graph (there is very little difference in performance over 1 year period), and secondly, 2020 was one of the largest bull runs in the history of SPY. [7] This report by RepTrack shows the impact the Emission Scandal had on Volkswagen [8] Micheal Platt, Professor of Neuroscience at Yale did a study that showcased that Apple users show brain empathy response to the Apple brand exactly the same way they would to a family member. Strangely, Samsung users did not have any positive or negative responses when good or bad news was released about the brand [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Selling calls or puts that will not hit to make 100% gain Posted: 29 Sep 2021 07:15 AM PDT Dear Reddit, I'm not a new investor. When it comes to options though I'm a huge noob. There is this one thought that passes by in my head frequently but I must be missing something. Because it sounds like free money. But I obviously know there is no such thing. What is the risk of me selling a put on Amazon expiring in 3 months with a strike price of $1000. If Amazon doesn't drop by 66% in those 3 months the sold put drops by 100% of the price because it expires worhtless. What am I missing here. Why aren't people doing these kind of trades frequently. Thanks [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 29 Sep 2021 08:06 AM PDT I noticed rather large drop in ASML stock. I usually don't follow short term price movement, but the change is rather sudden. Is there any news to go with this? The only article I find seem to be the company raising expected growth (11% yoy for the next 10 years), along with expected ~50% margins. Is this bad news somehow? Was more growth expected? [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| My China Bear Case (More than just Evergrande) Posted: 29 Sep 2021 07:23 AM PDT A lot of people are buying or contemplating on buying the dip on China. I wanted people to get more insight on what's going on in China so they understand their risks more before making a decision. I have my own biases against the CCP so take what I say into a grain of salt - I am welcoming of differing opinions and please call out any misinformation I may have posted. I know the topic of Evergrande has been beaten to death, and how damaging a real estate pop in China would be. And I'm not dismissing it, this itself is a large enough issue to bring an economic downturn in proportion to 2008 or a 1980s Japan in China without government intervention. With how much the GDP of construction is to China, and how much the typical investor in China invests in real estate , it's no mystery that a real estate pop would wreck havoc on the country. However, that is just one of many issues I want to highlight so people can be more informed about buying the dip, and understanding the risks. Many of the issues I note will also have an compounding effect on the real estate market in the big picture.
[link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| can employee of a company receive shares of a company from someone outside? Posted: 29 Sep 2021 01:36 PM PDT Is it legal for employee of company X to receive shares of the company as a gift / donation from someone outside the company? Can they receive shares anytime in the year? Does this vary per company? Would be insightful to learn if there are any rules for or against this [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Babcock - Great British Defence Recovery stock Posted: 29 Sep 2021 09:57 AM PDT Yet another reason why Babcock International is greatly undervalued, Cavendish Nuclear it's wholly owned subsidiary just construction an Advanced Nuclear Reactor demonstrator. https://www.u-battery.com/news/articles/u-battery-full-scale-vessel-mock-up-demonstrates-efficiencies-of-advanced-nuclear-technology [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| At what price will AMD see support? Reasonable entry price? Posted: 29 Sep 2021 12:21 PM PDT Im currently holding 40 shares at cost basis of 75. I sold off of 20 shares around 118. It briefly dipped under 100 today. I want to get some opinions on what you guys think will be the level of support and what would be a reasonable entry price? [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 29 Sep 2021 10:15 AM PDT $MIRM 's drug LIVMARLI (maralixibat) just got FDA approvel todayLink. They will be having a investor conference at 4:30 today. Both $TAK and $NVO have quite a bit of shares of $MIRM. Which one do you guys think would make a BO offer? Or would they do a split acquisition? Link [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| PLTR has won a 2 year contract, worth 58 mil. dollars, with the National Institutes of Health Posted: 29 Sep 2021 01:47 PM PDT Here is the link: https://www.fpds.gov/ezsearch/search.do?q=Palantir&s=FPDS.GOV&templateName=1.5.2&indexName=awardfull&sortBy=SIGNED_DATE&desc=Y Click "view" on the first contract to learn more about the deal. Total value is 58 million. After winning contracts with a total deal value over 900 mil.usd last quarter, it seems that PLTR is again doing great, at least in the government segment. As you can see in the link that I have provided, since September 23rd a total of 11 new deals were completed. (new contracts, plus options that were exercised). It also looks like that they are not only forming new partnerships, but they are also strengthening their relationship with agencies that are already clients. For example, they have worked with the NHI since 2018, created a specialised platform for managing the vaccine distribution in 2020 for them and now their collaboration continues with this new contract. I am an investor in PLTR and I think that one of the most bullish indicators is the fact that their software "sticks like glue". They have very high-customer retention rates and that is not only beneficial for the company in the financial aspect, but also shows the quality of their services [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Market fluctuates but fed/house/senate will not let the market crash Posted: 29 Sep 2021 01:26 PM PDT The market has been down quite a bit in September especially for the growth stocks. Like other idiots who are heavily invested in these stocks, I am also deep in RED. It may take a long long time before we really recover our initial investment into this sector. Most of these stocks (name it DKNG, SQ, Roku, NIO, Tesla, many many more), are 10-30 down compared with February 2021. The inflation, rate hike, treasury yield, all have one way or another affected these stocks. I am confident that the bear market for these stocks will be over soon or later so still holding. I have shifted some of my investment into SPY and QQQ and anytime one of my growth stocks gets to a point that I can sell with a small gain then will do so. However, seeing posts that the market is going to crash seems ridiculous. Many of the politicians (fed, house, and senate) have invested millions of dollars into the stock market so if they need to print money in an hourly basis, will do so to save the market if EVER EVER such thing is going to happen. There is probably less than 1% chance that the market may tank 20-30% in case something like COVID happens but we saw how quickly the market recovered. I was going to invest some into SPY options in June and thought let's wait for a downturn then invest my money and the market just went up and up until mid-September so even with the current downturn, I would have still been GREEN if had invested just in June. [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| I just found this interesting bit of news. Hope it helps! Posted: 29 Sep 2021 02:50 AM PDT A supply shock is about to hit the housing market—the question is how big?Homeowners should've gotten more help back in 2008. At least that's become the consensus among economists in the decade since the financial crash and subsequent foreclosure crisis. It's also why Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike came together to protect struggling homeowners by creating a COVID hardship forbearance program, which allowed mortgage borrowers to pause their payments, in March 2020. But on Sept. 30 the expanded mortgage forbearance program will finally begin its wind down—something that will have far-reaching effects on the broader economy and the housing market. There's never been a forbearance wind down like this, making the consequences all the more uncertain. At its height, the program protected 7.2 million homeowners. As the economy improved—with the unemployment rate falling from nearly 15% in April 2020 to 5.2% as of Aug. 2021—the number of borrowers in the program dropped, too. Now, there are just 1.5 million borrowers protected by the program. While some of these borrowers will be ready to resume their mortgage payments, others won't. In fact, the real estate industry is already preparing for a supply shock: Hundreds of thousands of these currently protected homes could soon be put on the market. Just don't expect that supply shock to come via foreclosures. Almost all of these borrowers have positive equity in their homes. So instead of foreclosing like the underwater 2008 homeowners, most can simply list their homes for sale. The ongoing strong COVID-19 housing market means these sellers might only have to wait days—or hours—before finding a buyer. At first glance, 1.5 million homes might not sound like a lot—considering we're a nation of 80 million homeowners. However, at the most recent count, there are only 1.3 million homes for sale, according to the National Association of Realtors. So if even a fraction of those homes currently in forbearance opt to list, it'd create something of a supply shock in the market. "A flood of new inventory, that's going to change conditions in the [housing] market," Chris Glynn, an economist at Zillow, told Fortune. "It's taking the foot off the pedal a bit." https://finance.yahoo.com/news/supply-shock-hit-housing-market-193000950.html [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 29 Sep 2021 10:03 AM PDT I am still a pretty new investor (since May this year). I currently hold VUAG which is a pretty simple S&P ETF but it is quite heavily weighted in tech. I also hold individual positons with MSFT and GOOGL so I'm looking to put a decent chunk of money into a solid ETF that is available in the UK ( in some form) and is tech free, ideally that pays a dividend. Any suggestions or input would be great . [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| I have $60k in CD funds. Should I withdraw early to put it into an ETF? Posted: 29 Sep 2021 11:34 AM PDT I have 50% of my funds in CD funds. The other 50% is in ETFs. I feel like my CD funds barely give me any in returns compared to stocks like QQQ, SPY, MSCI. I literally did the math, and if I would've invested my cash in stocks rather than a cd fund, I'd have gained an extra $9k by now. I want to early withdraw my funds from my CD fund right now so I can put it in SPY, QQQ, and MSCI. The only thing is that I was initially worried the stock market would crash (which is why I initially put it in CD funds) but it just keeps going up. I want to play it semi-safe but also get more in returns. I am comfortable with mild risk seeing that I'm in my mid 20s. I plan on buying a house hopefully in 1-2 years. Any thoughts on what I should do? [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secret projects Apple is working on over the next 10 years: Posted: 28 Sep 2021 07:17 PM PDT This is somewhat of a response to another post I saw on this subreddit saying Apple needs radical innovation to grow, and while I think that's not true and that Apple is a great company regardless of any future projects, I went ahead and did some digging and found a couple new projects Apple has in the works. —————— First off Apple has an insane RnD budget. They invested close to $19 BILLION dollars into research and development last year, and will only to continue investing more as we've seen in the years prior. Firstly, I think it's important to note that Apple won't have the first product in any of these markets, and that's a GOOD thing. When you look back at their history, it doesn't matter if they're the first. They've never been concerned with rushing products to the market. Their focus, and greatest strength as a company, is in having the best product, which oftentimes is simply a more refined and seamless experience achieved through years of research and fine-tuning. Take for example, the AirPods. There were plenty of wireless earbuds before AirPods, but for Apple it didn't matter. They went into a product category that already existed, and, like they've always done, created a more seamless, unified, and beautiful design, and ultimately ran away with the lead; In 2020 Apple's AirPods alone brought in around $23 billion, which was nearly as much as Netflix's overall revenue ($25 billion), and twice as much as AMD and Spotify's revenue. I see this same type of thing that happened with the iPod, iPhone, and AirPods either happening within the space of virtual reality, electric vehicles, healthcare, a combination of these two, or all three. Augmented and Virtual Reality: A good chunk of that RnD budget is said to be going towards Apple Glasses and AR/VR headsets. This article suggests Apple is working an advanced headset that has augmented and virtual reality; with 16 high-quality optical cameras, advanced computational ability, and iris recognition which may be able to identify who you are, specifically, just by looking at your iris. There is nothing like this on the market right now, and paired with Apple's ability to come out with more seamless and refined products than what's currently on the market at the time, they could very well create something worthy enough of controlling the market share. Aside from Virtual Reality headsets, there are other 'secret projects' that this huge RnD budget can pay for. The Apple Car: We know it exists. Mainly because in this interview with Elon Musk, Elon laughed at the reporter's question of if Apple's even taking the Apple Car seriously. He laughed because, as he said in the interview, it's an open-secret, and in fact it's very difficult to hide the over 1,000 engineers Apple hired to work on this project. Especially since he's in direct competition with Apple to hire electric car engineers and experts to come work at Tesla. Healthcare: Probably the biggest thing Apple is working on. The CEO of Apple, Tim Cook has repeatedly stated that he want's Apple biggest contribution to mankind to be through healthcare. In this piece from the Wall Street Journal, it's revealed how much Apple has really envisioned for its future in healthcare. They've said they want to offer health-monitoring subscription-based services through products like the Apple Watch, which there seems to be a lot of demand for right now, and they also want to offer their own primary care services with Apple employed doctors at its own clinics. However the WSJ goes through how difficult the latter part has been for Apple to get this off the ground, saying healthcare is an extremely difficult field to try to do improvements and innovations in. Haven, the joint-venture formed by Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan tried disrupting healthcare in the same way Apple wants to, but they disbanded after 3 years. Nonetheless, any one of these 'secret projects' Apple has cooking up in the background could be a massive catalyst for Apple's growth. Whether it be creating the Apple Glasses or a VR headset, an Apple Car that rivals Tesla, or building hospitals and expanding into healthcare subscription services. But even then, I still hold Apple with the assumption that NONE of these products will be successful. They are a great company with one of the strongest balance sheets in the world, with sales that continue to outpace other leading tech companies year-over-year, despite the same story for the last 15 years being that its simply gotten too big to grow anymore. They're building up more and more sticky, subscription-based revenue that despite being only around 20% of their yearly revenue, is equal to that of the entire annual revenue of companies like McDonald's and NVIDIA and it continues to steadily grow year-after-year. And they have an ecosystem of devices that will continue to get bigger, keeping customers locked in and making Apple's competitors have to work with them, not against them. In the case of Apple its not the first product that wins, it's the superior product that wins, and Apple has been very good at coming out with that superior product. So while some people think Apple's fully saturated the market or that they have no room left to grow, I think they're an already growing company with many opportunities to supplement that growth in the future. [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 29 Sep 2021 01:35 PM PDT Has anyone here bought leaps for airline stocks? With investors starting to revert to bonds and traditional stocks, do you think it is a good investment? What value transportation or infrastructure dependent stocks are you investing in? [link] [comments]  | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 29 Sep 2021 05:57 AM PDT Can someone help me understand why BGFV is being shorted to almost 50% of its float? It's a profitable company with a 550m market cap, 100m cash, no debt. It has been growing rapidly in the last year with increases in sales and earnings. It does not seem like the type of company you'd want to short. Any thoughts? At the current rate of growth, all short positions will be losing money relatively soon. [link] [comments]  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Stocks - Investing and trading for all. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment