• Breaking News

    Monday, May 10, 2021

    Stocks - r/Stocks Daily Discussion Monday - May 10, 2021

    Stocks - r/Stocks Daily Discussion Monday - May 10, 2021


    r/Stocks Daily Discussion Monday - May 10, 2021

    Posted: 10 May 2021 02:30 AM PDT

    These daily discussions run from Monday to Friday including during our themed posts.

    Some helpful links:

    If you have a basic question, for example "what is EPS," then google "investopedia EPS" and click the investopedia article on it; do this for everything until you have a more in depth question or just want to share what you learned.

    Please discuss your portfolios in the Rate My Portfolio sticky..

    See our past daily discussions here. Also links for: Technicals Tuesday, Options Trading Thursday, and Fundamentals Friday.

    submitted by /u/AutoModerator
    [link] [comments]

    Chipotle to hike wages, debut referral bonuses in attempt to hire 20,000 workers

    Posted: 10 May 2021 09:59 AM PDT

    Chipotle said it will increase restaurant wages resulting in a $15 average hourly wage by the end of June, as it looks to bring on 20,000 workers.

    Starting pay for hourly crew members will range from $11 to $18 an hour. There are opportunities to advance to general manager positions with average annual pay of $100,000.

    Chipotle CEO Brian Niccol said the current labor market is among the most challenging he's seen in his career in the restaurant industry. He cited a range of reasons including child care and a rethinking of work post-pandemic.

    As the labor market heats up, Chipotle Mexican Grill announced Monday it's raising pay for restaurant workers, reaching an average of $15 an hour by the end of June.

    The company has also introduced employee referral bonuses of $200 for crew members and $750 for apprentices or general managers, as it looks to recruit 20,000 new workers across the country to support its peak season and new restaurant openings.

    The pay hike for new and existing restaurant workers, both hourly and salaried, will roll out over the next few weeks, with hourly crew wages starting in the range of $11 to $18 per hour. There are also opportunities to advance to a restaurateur position, which is the highest-ranking general manager, with average compensation of $100,000 a year, Chipotle said, in as little as 3½ years.

    Chipotle is getting creative in its hiring initiatives. It is hosting a virtual career fair on Thursday on Discord, the social platform, that will include sessions with current employees. Other Chipotle benefits include mental health care and 401(k) plans and debt-free degrees for workers after 120 days from nonprofit, accredited universities in partnership with Guild Education.

    Source

    submitted by /u/Brothanogood
    [link] [comments]

    Misunderstood market fueled by fear mongering

    Posted: 10 May 2021 10:34 AM PDT

    The market is rotating, there will not be a crash, there will not be hyperinflation, there will not be just 2% inflation, commodities are not the only cure as a hedge to protect yourself and neither is yoloing into $PG... CMRE and CRE motgages will bust around the same time the fed will need to change policy and talk/enact rate hikes and bond tapering due to 3-5% inflation (which although high is historically normal) after that we will see a broader 10-25% market correction due to margin debt and valuation models ignoring fundamentals, many currently fair value companies suchs as $LMT $REYN, and $TSM (I would argue 4.1x revenue at $110/share is fair value) will drop leaving smart money an excellent buying opportunity while the mass media and broader market panic sells, hedgefunds are still overleveraging which is the greatest danger to the market currently i.e $BLK but their stocks and funds will not crash down until policy change since borrowing money is so cheap and making money off that regardless of interest is easy. Notice how on a visual like finviz you can see that rotation

    TLDR: no crash. no hyperinflation. buy the dip in certain stocks

    Edit: I am wording this as factual, I am stubborn in my beliefs but I cannot predict the market same to anyone, I apologize to all for my poor usage!

    submitted by /u/Knarsan
    [link] [comments]

    PSFE (Paysafe): A better way to bet on multiple high growth companies like DRAFTKINGS, BARSTOOL, FORTNITE, TWITCH, YOUTUBE, SPOTIFY, ETC.

    Posted: 10 May 2021 01:35 AM PDT

    Paysafe is one hell of a company. They are a fin-tech like PayPal and Squares, thus should be given a higher multiple for valuation. They got a lot of exciting and growth customers/partners like Barstool (PENN), YouTube (Google), Twitch (AMZN), FanDuel (PDYPY), Roblox (RBLX), CoinBase (COIN), Visa (V), ApplePay (APPL), BetMGM (MGM), Spotify (SPOT), Microsoft/Xbox etc., and on top of that they got a huge digital wallet (#2 in market share) where you can trade/buy the fast-growing cryptocurrencies like Bitcoins. I truly believed this Paysafe is undervalued compared to its peers. You can read a very good Paysafe DD below on reddit and it gives a lot of insight of Paysafe valuation and bear cases:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/mysz54/reviewing_the_bear_case_on_paysafe_psfe/

    (the link above is a really really good read with lots of info about Paysafe including discussion of bear cases, so I'm not going to repeat most of the good points the author mentioned in that sub.)

    Most of the time analysis use assumptions to make predictions on future growth. As an example, EV-related stocks (PLUG, BLNK, QS, LAZR, NKLA, BLDP, etc) get higher or ridiculous valuation based on assumption that gasoline cars will eventually be phased out. As you can see most if not all of these companies are unprofitable and some don't even have revenue, yet worth billions. While this assumption may be accurate, it is extremely hard to know when will growth begin to accelerate. Because of this predictive nature, it's really hard to know how long you will have to hold onto the stocks before they pop. When or if it will pop is anyone's guess. So while holding onto these stocks will likely result in wild price swings thus high risk / high rewards.

    But what if you have the data before you showing the financial growth of your customers or partners? If your customers/partners' revenue grows, it's more likely than not they are using more of your products or services. Paysafe is one such company where you can actually look at their customers/partners' financial reports to predict where the company will go in the future and when growth will start. For this reason, Paysafe is more of a lower risk but still has high reward potential.

    Paysafe will be reporting earning for the very first time as a public company again on May 11. The good news is we already have their customers results in and here are some breakdown of their 1st QTR results showing huge growth:

    1. PENN (Reported May 7, 2021) - "Penn National's income from operations rose to $216.5 million in the first quarter against ($560.6) million in the prior-year quarter. Adjusted EBITDAR jumped 77.2% from the year-ago quarter to $447 million. Moreover, adjusted EBITDAR margin expanded to 35.1% from 22.6% a year ago." ( source: https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1515673/penn-national-penn-q1-earnings-revenues-beat-estimates )
    2. DraftKing ( Reported May 7, 2021) - "DraftKings is raising its fiscal year 2021 revenue guidance from a range of $900 million to $1 billion to a range of $1.05 billion to $1.15 billion, which equates to year-over-year growth of 63% to 79% and a 16% increase compared to the midpoint of our previous guidance"

    (Source: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/07/2225374/0/en/DraftKings-Reports-First-Quarter-2021-Results-and-Raises-2021-Revenue-Guidance.html )

    1. Spotify (April 28th, 2021)- "Revenue increased 16% to €2.15 billion ($2.6 billion) from €1.85 billion ($2.22 billion) in the same period last year…." (source: https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/streaming/9564180/spotify-q1-2021-earnings-report/)

    2. Youtube/Google ( April 27th, 2021 ) - " In its first-quarter earnings report Tuesday, Google parent company Alphabet said YouTube brought in revenue of $6.01 billion in advertising revenue during the quarter — up from $4 billion from a year ago, for a growth rate of 49%. That's an acceleration over its 46% growth in Q4. It's also nearly twice the growth rate of Netflix, which reported 24% revenue growth in Q1, and expects growth to slow to 19% next quarter." (source: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/27/youtube-could-soon-equal-netflix-in-revenue.html )

    3. Skillz ( May 4, 2021 ) - "Revenue grew to $83.7 million during the first quarter of 2021, up 92% over the prior year. Gross profit grew to $79.4 million during the first quarter of 2021, up 95% over the prior year." (source: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210504006307/en/CORRECTING-and-REPLACING-Skillz-Reports-Record-Q1-Revenue-and-Raises-2021-Guidance )

    As you can see these Paysafe's customers/partners are reporting explosive growth. While some of these companies may report an earning loss it may be due to higher expenses such as customers acquisition cost (i.e. Draftking). However, here we are more focused on their revenue as the more transactions they do the more likely all or part of that transaction is done by Paysafe. These companies reported earnings before Paysafe, so it can be highly expected Paysafe will report a very good earning and future growth projection tomorrow ( May 11).

    Several things to note about Paysafe besides their customer's earning growth. These factors will also influence Paysafe's future growth:

    1. They are a monopoly when it comes to iGaming/Sport Betting as you can see the explosive growth by DKNG, MGM, PENN, SKLZ, etc.
    2. Paysafe took a hit during the pandemic because they also do offline transaction processing, but now things are opening up we can expect going forward these offline transactions will grow again. Also, when re-opening occur, more sport events will occur thus more betting means more transactions for Paysafe.
    3. They are #2 in digital wallets and you can buy digital currency with the wallet. These currency has been generating huge revenue for PayPal and SQ (more on this below)

    Finally, both PayPal and SQ reported earning before Paysafe and their results beat estimation:

    Paypal earning ( May 5, 2021) " Revenue: $6.03 billion vs. $5.90 billion expected by Refinitiv" (source: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/05/paypal-pypl-earnings-q1-2021.html )

    Square earning ( May 6, 2021 ) "Square reported a profit of 41 cents per share vs. 16 cents per share expected in a Refinitiv survey of analysts. It also brought in $5.06 billion of revenue vs. $3.36 billion expected by Refinitiv." ( source: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/06/square-sq-earnings-q1-2021.html)

    So I can say with confidence Paysafe will likely beat their own guidance for Q1 on May 11th. For those of you who don't know Paysafe, they are not a small player. Their transaction volume is about that of SQ ~$100 Billion. If Paysafe is able to show growth on par with PayPal and SQ they should be trading at a much higher multiple. See the reddit link above for DD on valuation.

    In summary, I think Paysafe is a low risk / high reward stock compare to other fintech. Their growth is easier to predict as we can rely on their publicly traded customers data which is showing high growth going forward. They got the 2nd largest digital wallet. They are involved in the highly popular and fast growth digital currency market. I believe as a monopoly in iGaming/Sport Betting their growth will be massive when the 4 largest states: CA, TX, NY, FL begin to allow online sport betting. This is something about Paysafe that I like so much because no other fintech has. This is a massive high growth area and they own the space. For these reason, I am extremely bullish and I like Paysafe for both short and longer term play.

    Disclaimer: I own Paysafe commons, warrants, and option calls. I am not a financial adviser. No part of what I wrote above shall be constructed as financial or investment advice. Speak with a professional before making important decisions about your money, your professional life, or your personal life.

    submitted by /u/vegancash
    [link] [comments]

    Himax ($HIMX) is a STRONG BUY (in my opinion)

    Posted: 10 May 2021 09:15 AM PDT

    Himax Technologies: $HIMX

    • Market cap - approximately $2.0 B @ $12.3x~ per share at the moment.
    • Full Investor presentation: https://www.himax.com.tw/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/1Q21_HIMX-Investor-Presentation_Final.pdf?v=1
    • TLDR; on why it's a strong buy:
      • Company is consistently growing each quarter, financially speaking
      • Future guidance is extremely positive
        • "Himax is the dominant automotive TDDI technology provider with mass production experience and advanced specification for leading panel makers. Although only small volume shipments in 2020, we anticipate meaningful shipment volume starting 2H 2021"
      • Industry itself is projected to grow in the coming years
      • Industry itself is important (components for phones, tablets, cars, TVs and more).

    1) About the company:

    Review slides #8-9 in the above link.

    2) Second, let's review the simple quarterly earnings, including future guidance:

    Guidance: Q2 2021 Q1 2021 Q4 2020 Q3 2020 Q2 2020
    Revenue 15-20% increase QoQ $309 M* $276 M* $240 M* 187
    EPS .54 - .60 .38* .20 .05 .01
    Gross Margin 45.5% - 47.5% 40.2%* 31.2%* 22.3% 21.0%

    *All-time high

    3) Customer list by product types:

    FULL CUSTOMER LIST - Slide #17

    • DDIC - #11
    • TDDI - #13
    • WLO & 3D Sensing - #14
    • CIS & Ultralow Power Smart Sensing - #15
    • LCoS Microdisplays - #16

    4) Market share for Display Drivers:

    Slide #12

    • Large Panel - 10.1% (down vs previous quarter)
    • LCD Smartphone - 10.4% (down vs previous quarter)
    • Tablet - 42.9% (up vs previous quarter)
    • Automobile - 29.7% (up vs previous quarter)

    *It should be noted, Automobile is currently a very profitable portion of the business (hence the growing financials).

    5) Global TDDI Forecast:

    Slide #20 (in units)

    • 2020 - 921 M
    • 2021 - 871 M
    • 2022 - 959 M
    • 2023 - 1,037 M
    • 2024 - 1,099 M
    • 2025 - 1,168 M
    submitted by /u/SniXSniPe
    [link] [comments]

    DKNG has not had a great couple of weeks

    Posted: 10 May 2021 05:38 AM PDT

    Draftkings had a moderately positively trending earnings report and they have been dropping pretty consistently the last couple weeks. Any news I'm missing here directly associated with them? They have been a pretty substantial part of my portfolio for a while and I'm confident they will be much higher then they are now in the future but just curious if I'm missing something. I've seen 2 different analysts officially upgraded them to roughly an $80 a share price projection over the last couple months and one of those was just in the last few weeks.

    submitted by /u/big-sexy89
    [link] [comments]

    Are we in the middle of a correction or signaling to a crash?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 07:28 AM PDT

    Every 3 month chart of stocks I look at has gone down. Unfortunately I got into investing 3 months ago, and all my positions are at losses. Now I know that we had a ton of new investors over 2020 and into 2021, but in your opinion why has the market been down so much on individual stocks? I'm still waiting for the right entry for the companies I believe in, and I won't sell the stocks I have for a loss, I just want to know if you think the bear patterns are signaling towards correction or possible crash? Also thanks govt for devaluing my dollar

    Edit: Thank you all for discussing things with me! As a rookie investor, having a community that will take the time to teach me things means a lot. Here's to a good year!

    submitted by /u/xSasquatchxX
    [link] [comments]

    Even blue chip tech stocks are getting killed

    Posted: 10 May 2021 12:00 PM PDT

    Is this just a normal correction after a huge run up last year? Somewhat new to investing so I took a pretty conservative approach (granted I am heavier on tech than I should be)

    All I've been seeing is red for the most part even with industry giants like Apple, Amazon, even those are down 2.5% just today alone.

    What do you guys do in this situation? It's clear that the rotation out of tech/high P/E ratios is and has been underway. I plan to hold those stocks as they are some of the best companies in history, but wow it hurts seeing days like today. Anyone else going through similar pain?

    submitted by /u/DrewD_1847
    [link] [comments]

    How to deal with stress when your profit is slowly going down from an enjoyable sum to 0?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 11:35 AM PDT

    I made a decent sum this year (30k) by gambling on Gamestop through stupid luck. However, since selling in January my profit has dropped to around 14k, mainly from still holding tech stocks that are all in the red: BB, Corsair, Coinbase, Apple, and CDPR. Thankfully I do have an SP500 ETF, but it's only 1/5 of my entire portfolio.

    Now I'm still happy with being up 14k, but I'm watching this number go lower and lower each day and I'm worried that it's eventually going to go down to 0 or into the red. Before I wasn't too concerned with the falling price when my profit was in the 20s, but as it's getting closer to single-digit thousands I'm feeling uneasy that I'll lose everything that I ended up earning with these other stocks.

    How dumb would it be to cash out and just accept the lower profits? Should I just delete the app for a year and throw the rest of my cash into an SP500 ETF?

    submitted by /u/bartmasta
    [link] [comments]

    ARKG a good buy right now?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 10:01 AM PDT

    It's down 30% over the last 3 months. Don't know a whole lot about genomics but I often hear about it being a good long term hold.

    Curious on your thoughts as I've been on the fence about buying another 50 shares so that I can start wheeling it.

    submitted by /u/Jasonmv222
    [link] [comments]

    Anyone holding TTD today?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 07:38 AM PDT

    What's your take on the stock split/dividend reaction? I'm holding - I bought in early last year in the 300s and topped off again at 560.

    My only concern is Apple shaking up the ad platforms visibility and it being a broader issue. I saw this stock fly to 900 and back down, still holding.

    submitted by /u/JobMarketWoes
    [link] [comments]

    Why is everyone rotating out of growth stocks right now?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 10:11 AM PDT

    Anyone seeing the growth tech stock taking a beating? Just curious if there is something bigger in the markets that I should be aware of. Maybe just uncertainty with COVID in India and all that? Or China pressuring a number of areas? All of the blue chip and dividend stocks are way up right now. Seems like a great time to buy the dip if anything, right?

    submitted by /u/xrtduffman
    [link] [comments]

    DD: $IRBT - The Dust Has Settled

    Posted: 10 May 2021 07:35 AM PDT

    Note: Before reading, consider if I'm worth my salt. Here's an overview of my performance since I started posting Stock Analysis to reddit: https://www.markovchained.com/profiles/view/reddit:F1rstxLas7. Any good investor heavily considers the underlying performance of a business before buying into them, so why shouldn't we do the same on reddit?

    Intro: iRobot = Roomba, got it? It's really that simple. It's a household name brand that sells their robot vacuums, as well as automatic floor mopping robots, a robot that teaches kids to code(this speaks directly to my heart), and their new robotic lawn mower. Incorporated in 1990, Headquartered in Massachusetts, blah, blah, blah.

    Bear case: Yeah, we're going to do this analysis a little differently.

    There have been a few good threads examining IRBT, most of which have the same few comments and criticisms.

    1. "There are so many low cost alternatives to the Roomba, iRobot has no chance at maintaining market leadership." This isn't wrong, only... it kind of is. iRobot has been stating this for literally years in their 10Ks. They know it exists. There are low cost alternatives that reduce the quality vs price trade-off, but this does 2 things:

      • Creates a race to the bottom effect between low cost manufacturers thus competition grows between them just to survive. This reduces overall profitability of low cost brands and removes them from the market sooner.
      • Hurts the robovac industry short term as people purchase these low quality products, realize they're not super effective, and decide to just stick with a regular vacuum in the future.
    2. "IRBT has failed to capitalize on their technology or to expand." First of all, they lead the market in their technology and I don't mean ahead of the aforementioned discount brands, I mean against Samsung, Shark, and other major players in the household cleaning industry that have been established for years. They are specialists, through and through. Their process is slow and deliberate and that's exactly why they'll maintain their market edge. Admittedly, this is exactly what frustrates investors- the lack of perceived growth in a time when every other tech-centric consumer good is gaining momentum- and I love iRobot for this.

    3. "IRBT stock price hasn't really moved much." If you're investing based on stock price movement, you're not investing at all. But since I know that's not helpful, fine, the price has about tripled in the last 5 years.

    Alright, I admit that the above Bear case was only used to illustrate some rebuttals to common arguments against IRBT. It's important to consider that just because I disagree with the arguments above, doesn't mean that the rest of the market does as well. Public sentiment is always a factor when considering investments and I realize that right now I'm betting against the above arguments. Below, I will get further into some of my subjective analysis that further defends this thesis.

    Metrics:

    1. P/E of 16. I know, everyone is hating on the P/E ratio lately, but it's still a valuable indicator of a company's performance whether we like it or not. Ok, so a P/E of 16 is reasonable at least, especially considering today's current max market P/E or Sharpe ratio. But that's not even why I'm mentioning it. If we exclude last year's COVID crisis effect on the market, iRobot's P/E ratio has never ever been this low. Now that's not to say it can't go lower, but I don't think I've ever seen a strong, high functioning company been as undervalued compared to itself as iRobot is right now. (MacroTrends)
    2. PEG ratio, as a result of the above, is an absurd .89 if dividing P/E by the projected next 5 years of earnings growth. What's great about this is that that's a low end estimate for earnings growth. IRBT saw an earnings growth of 73% over the TTM, is projected for a 62% EPS growth over the coming year, and even their past 5 years show a 28.5% EPS growth. Dividing the P/E by any of those numbers makes the undervaluation theory even stronger. It's absurd how undervalued this is right now. (Finviz)
    3. Debt: Zero debt, but I did want to mention this for a specific reason. When a company lacks any debt, it's perceived that growth is limited if financial leverage isn't being used. This is understandable, but I think that iRobot has found a middle ground between funding new projects with their own cash and maintaining a ridiculously healthy balance sheet.
    4. Other Basics: Revenue, gross revenue, and Cash Flow from Operations has continued to climb steadily year after year. Their product lineup might not be growing, but they sure as Heck are growing stronger financially over time. Also, their entire cash position outweighs their entire Liabilities column on the Balance Sheet- how can you not love that?

    5. Institutional Ownership is 100%. There's no real room here. This shows confidence in the company, but prevents major moves upward by a new, big interested buyer to jump the price significantly. It also brings along the potential risk of a major move down if an Institution decides it wants to pull out. What compounds this issue is that there's only about 28 million shares of iRobot to go around and while they have issued buybacks to reduce this amount, which is good for investors, it can also be very scary during tumultuous times.

    Subjective analysis: I love but had the concern going into this that the company hasn't "grown" in a few years. After looking through their financial statements, I've been proven wrong. As a matter of fact, they've proven me wrong time and time again when trying to find cracks in the armor. I was hoping that perception of their product lineup was poor- it's not. Even with Samsung being in the same market as them since 2014, Roomba has crushed their competition and it's partly because the customer base believes in them. I then turned my attention to employee sentiment -that too was a dead end. Glassdoor shows raves reviews for iRobot. People like working there.

    Warren Buffett has said(yes, I know, the entirety of reddit quotes him but today this is extra applicable to this thesis) that there might be a thousand people who don't agree with your investing opinion- and that's fine. As it stands now, I don't think many people perceive iRobot as a company with the growth momentum of a rocket ship. Putting myself in the perspective of a business owner, which is what you become the moment you hit the 'Place Buy Order' button, has made me realize that I would love to own this business. It's a profitable leader in a market segment that has the ability to expand further into the quickly growing tech and robotics industries, but doesn't rely on them. So if the haters hate then let them hate, and watch the money pile up.

    If you'd like to read more about my investment strategies and analysis or other Due Diligence that I've done, you can find them on my personal site, TheStockChartist.com. Mods, if this isn't allowed, please let me know and I'd be more than happy to remove this link.

    Disclaimer: The above is not advice, just an analysis meant for educational purposes.

    submitted by /u/F1rstxLas7
    [link] [comments]

    Amazon Tees Up Jumbo Eight-Part Debt Sale, Its First in a Year

    Posted: 10 May 2021 06:13 AM PDT

    Amazon.com Inc. is selling bonds to refinance debt and buy back stock in its first offering in nearly a year. The online retail giant is issuing debt in eight parts, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. The longest portion, a 40-year security, may yield around 115 basis points over Treasuries, said the person, who asked not to be identified as the details are private.

    Amazon has been a fairly infrequent issuer, but it comes in big on those rare occasions. It last tapped the bond market in June 2020, borrowing $10 billion for general corporate purposes. Prior to that, it sold $16 billion of bonds in 2017 to help finance its acquisition of Whole Foods Market Inc.

    The proceeds of Monday's offering will be for general corporate purposes, which may also include acquisitions and working capital, said the person. The two-year bond will be allocated for eligible green or social projects.

    Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo & Co. are managing the sale, said the person.

    Source: Bloomberg

    submitted by /u/Johnblr
    [link] [comments]

    MGNI bounce swing trade

    Posted: 10 May 2021 12:21 PM PDT

    Hey guys, MGNI just dropped near 20% in one single day. This excessive drop going to have a regression to the mean, meaning tomorrow will be a small bounce of 5-7%. My play is to buy in today and sell tomorrow late. Any one have any thoughts on this solid growth company?

    submitted by /u/dannydeol
    [link] [comments]

    What to research when choosing a stock to invest?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 10:50 AM PDT

    I'm pretty new to stock investing, just started last year December and I like to pick individual stocks. I always hear about having a diverse portfolio and I definitely see the benefits of that, but I just don't really know where to start exactly when researching.

    I'd appreciate any advice, thanks.

    submitted by /u/Iodicacid
    [link] [comments]

    TLRY Earnings today?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 10:21 AM PDT

    I see that TLRY is reporting today when I search the ticker on bing (they are sourcing that from Zacks) but then I don't see any indication of this on yahoo finance and I didn't get an email notifying me about it from my brokerage. Can anyone confirm or deny if they are reporting today?

    submitted by /u/PotatoTrader1
    [link] [comments]

    APD - A company set to dominate the Hydrogen business (but not reliant)

    Posted: 10 May 2021 07:18 AM PDT

    I've been into Hydrogen for quite a while, and I think APD is severely undervalued at its current price. I'd love to hear other opinions on this, and Hydrogen in general, but I also want to give my perspective, and why I'm extremely bullish on it.

    Hydrogen production costs have fallen 40% since 2015,and are expected to fall by a further 40% through 2025. $2/kg is considered a potential tipping point that will make hydrogen competitive in multiple sectors, including power generation and long-range shipping.

    People think we need to move to EV cars to lower Carbon Dioxide emissions is the big move we need to make, but transport only accounts for 16% of greenhouse gases. Planes cannot run off electricity or solar, they would require either nuclear power, or hydrogen to sustain travel. Maybe you might disagree here, but I think the safety concerns would make it unfeasible. For a lot of industries, especially ones reliant on forms crude oil, hydrogen may be the only feasible replacement, with its extremely high kilogram calorific value. Other viable options are Butane, Methane, and Natural Gas.

    What are the current uses of hydrogen? Well, key factors driving the hydrogen generation market growth include rising demand for petroleum coke in the steel industry and development in the cement and power generation industries, this all ignoring the many favourable government initiatives regarding the sustainable and green environment.

    $APD not only produces hydrogen, but also have room to grow in their production of Oxygen, Nitrogen, Argon and Carbon Dioxide. They have great earnings and a P/E ratio below 40. The projected market for Oxygen is $30 Billion by 2025, for Nitrogen its about $33 Billion. Argon has a much smaller, but not insignificant projected market of $487 million by 2026, and $12.1 billion for carbon dioxide by 2027. As if that weren't enough, they also produce semiconductor materials (with a semiconductor shortage, there is a lot to gain here); natural gas liquefaction technology and equipment (I don't know much about that stuff); epoxy additives (Epoxy resins are used in Wind Turbines, Electrical systems like circuit boards. Epoxy resin market is expected to almost double in value to over $10 Billion); Gas Cabinets (It costs $4k to get a projected market size, I aint paying that shit, but for reference here's what wikipedia has to say: A gas cabinet is a metallic enclosure which is used to provide local exhaust ventilation system for virtually all of the gases used or generated in the Semiconductor, Solar, MEMS, NANO, Solar PV, Manufacturing and other advanced technologies.).

    I listened into their conference call today to see what had to be said, and some very interesting points were made, that puts my bullish stance far higher. There is a lot of debate on the efficacy of green hydrogen. The argument is that its inefficient. Well, APD have aims to become the leaders of Blue Hydrogen, alongside their efforts to produce green hydrogen. Now, what is blue hydrogen many may ask. Well blue hydrogen refers to hydrogen produced using natural gas, with the CO2 emissions generated during the process being captured and stored. I plan on sending an email to investor relations to see if I can get more details on this, as I'm aware they sell CO2 and CO, but this development puts me very bullish on the company, as this would be an efficient way to produce hydrogen with low environmental impact. Blue Hydrogen is not a dream either. I posted yesterday on the Dutch Government's subsidies for a carbon capture project, which directly benefited APD. Carbon capture is already a reality.

    Another thing said during the conference call was that they're very bullish on is high purity Nitrogen in the electronics market. They've earned a lot of contracts, although some of them they cannot announce for client privacy reasons. Sales of atmospheric gases constituted 46% of sales in 2020, while hydrogen, syngas and related products constituted 22% of sales. Evidently they don't rely on hydrogen for revenue, but being the leading provider, they put themselves in a good position to profit heavily from the eventual move to hydrogen

    A lot of interesting questions were answered in the conference call, which I suggest anyone thinking about investing having read this should listen to. I've said it for quite a while, and I'll continue to say it, but hydrogen is the future for the majority of industries, and the safest investment you can make into hydrogen is APD, they have insanely strong earnings to their name (11% CAGR), and offer a 2% dividend as an added benefit of holding shares. They don't do any stock buybacks, but I'm completely fine with that. P/E of about 34, and earnings are not affected by any rises in natural gas (Their customers subsidise the cost of natural gas).

    TLDR: I think this is severly undervalued. They are profitable now, but do they have room to fucking grow. As clean energy is pushed more and more, I think their earnings will grow exponentially, and I wouldn't put it past them to do it.

    submitted by /u/Traditional_Fee_8828
    [link] [comments]

    Triple leveraged Nasdaq - TQQQ

    Posted: 10 May 2021 12:14 PM PDT

    They say this is a risky play, and should only be done by professionals who have a thorough understanding of how it works.

    This assumes the non professionals are trying to make money though, right? If my goal was to lose 15 percent in a week, then I'm doing well?

    submitted by /u/JayKayne
    [link] [comments]

    Used a bunch of math to find the best stocks per industry, performed DD on that subset, and provided the steps and the stocks below.

    Posted: 10 May 2021 06:31 AM PDT

    TLDR: I did a bunch of math based on some reasonably good ideas to determine a selection of stocks worth performing additional DD on. The ones that passed the DD, I then bought. All of them. Lists of stocks found in 2020 and 2021 Experiment sections.

    Observations/Assumptions

    • Index funds have been shown to be the most successful stock investing instrument for most people
    • Index fund returns, such as the S&P 500, are now predominately determined by a handful of extremely large, mostly tech stocks.
    • Most funds do not beat the index over a long period.
    • The more money that flows into index funds, however, may worsen the results of index funds.
    • The cost of stock trades at most firms is now $0.00 and some allow for fractional shares.
      • This is a simplification as there are costs between the spreads, but you either pay management fees or the spread costs. You no longer have to have commissions on top.
    • During times of volatility, companies that have poor financials will likely find it challenging to survive.
    • Zombie companies are able to survive for longer periods during times of extremely cheap debt.
    • Index funds have these 3 issues that are hard to get around:
      • You are unable to effectively Tax-Loss Harvest even though many of the holdings that make up the index would have had losses, thereby reducing the return compared to directly investing in that same set of stocks in the same proportions.
        • This may not be totally accurate as the manager may be doing some of this, but you don't have the choice of when he sells, only when you do.
      • You have no control over the holdings within the fund and may be supporting things you don't want to support.
      • Due to the way the index works, any large stock that becomes part of the index is potentially a huge drag on the index. This happened when Tesla was going to be added on 12/21/2020, which was announced on 11/16/2020, forcing funds to buy the stock at the same time driving up the price, which had already been driven up by people buying the stock knowing it was then going to get added to the index forcing more people to buy the stock. If you think it sounds kind of circular, that's because it is.
        • Funds can attempt to counter this with some complex financial tools, but that doesn't mean they are successful.
    • For most people it is impossible to time the market effectively. Tons of us seem to be able to buy at the peak no problem.
    • Stock prices have all available information at the time priced into them.
    • The markets are relatively efficient over the long-term.
    • Companies with strong financials, a competitive advantage, good management, a sustainable business model, etc. tend to do better than companies missing one or more of those attributes over the long-term.
    • Tech seems to be heavily weighted in most indexes. I don't see this necessarily as a problem. In my mind the digital landscape is infinite compared to the physical world's finite space. With more tech being found in every day devices, the advancement of Industry 4.0, and younger generations more tech heavy than older generations will continue that trend in my opinion.

    Hypothesis

    Using industry bench marking against the best companies in each industry in equal measure should provide a well diversified portfolio that over the long term should be able to beat the S&P 500.

    Industry Classification

    • For Experiment 2020 the Sector was used to determine where companies should be compared.
      • This is made up of 11 sectors such as Information Technology, Communication Services, Utilities, etc.
      • This seemed to be too restrictive and compared companies against each other that aren't really accurate comparisons. See the example on ROE below.
    • So, for Experiment 2021 I used the Microsoft Excel Stock function to pull industries for all the stocks.
      • This looks like it pulls data mostly from Industry and Sub-industry.
      • This was successful on 98% of the stocks and for the final 2% I manually classified based on the taxonomy in the Global Industry Classification Standard.
      • I ended up needing to collapse the structure a little further. Originally there were 55 classes with many of the classes having less than 10 parts. I was able to collapse this to 44 classes. This will likely be tweaked a little further next year as I had mathematical issues dealing with averages/medians that were negative. There were also just too many categories with similar enough results that they could be combined.

    Experiment 2020

    750 stocks were analyzed against their peers in their industry. Stocks were given a score based on their relative percentage compared to the industry index. For example, each companies' average ROE of the last 4 years was compared to this index value with the following type of breakdown:

    • ROE < Index ROE = Poor = 1
    • ROE > Index ROE = Good = 2
    • ROE > 150% of Index ROE = Great = 3

    For example, the ROE communication services industry index value used was 10.10%. If a communication services company had a ROE average of 9%, they would receive a poor rating. If they had a ROE of 10.5% they would receive a good rating. If they had a ROE of 25% they would receive a great rating.

    This was done for all of the metrics below:

    • ROE
    • Revenue Growth %
    • EBITDA %
    • FCF %

    The relative scores used for each of the metrics was tweaked until there was a good distribution of results. e.g., if the 150% revenue growth only found 5 companies with a Great rating, that may need to be decreased to 125% for a better distribution.

    Any stock that received a poor in any of the 4 metrics was eliminated.

    Example on ROE https://imgur.com/a/kujNkWE

    That left 53 stocks. EBITDA was then analyzed to see if it was declining, and if so, it too was eliminated.

    This left 45 stocks. These 45 were reviewed more thoroughly. What did the company do? What were their competitive advantages? Are they currently in any lawsuits? Does their debt look out of control? Do I see them being a long-term sustainable choice? Is their IP about to expire? Essentially boiling down to: Is there any reason that I want to exclude them?

    That left 26 across 7 sectors. https://imgur.com/a/NsBdPtb

    These 26 stocks were bought in equal amounts in July 2020, August 2020, and September 2020. To easily perform time weighted analysis of these stocks and determine if there was an opportunity cost, 10% of the total purchase each period was also allocated to VFIAX.

    The chart below shows the total return of each stock including reinvested dividends. MATH INDEX, second to the bottom, is the average of returns. https://imgur.com/a/al60PZN

    2020 LIST OF STOCKS:

    • ABMD
    • ADBE
    • ANET
    • BWXT
    • CRL
    • DG
    • ENR
    • ETSY
    • EXEL
    • ISRG
    • KLAC
    • LKQ
    • LRCX
    • MNST
    • MPWR
    • MTCH
    • OLED
    • PAYC
    • PHM
    • PRAH
    • TER
    • TTD
    • UI
    • VEEV
    • VMW
    • VRTX

    You can see VFIAX returned 28.20% vs the MATH INDEX of 36.56% over the same period, 30% higher returns.

    For those wondering how the exclusions did, they were only tracked against the first July purchase, but that comparison to date, including dividends for July purchase only, would be:

    • MATH INDEX return of 39.24%
    • Exclusions return of 33.75%
    • VFIAX return of 30.05%

    Overall after ~10 months we have 2 excellent results.

    1. The full set of initial stocks had a greater return than the S&P 500
    2. The ones that passed the more extensive due diligence returned an additional 5.5%

    This is obviously a short period. Can we do it again this year? Should we go bigger? Yes.

    Experiment 2021

    2,850 tickers of the largest US stocks were identified as the initial list. The stocks had their last 5 years averaged for each of nine metrics:

    • Revenue Growth % - shows growth rate of the company
    • Profit Margin – shows how effective the business is at making money
    • Operating Margin – shows how much money the company earns on its revenue
    • FCF Margin – shows how efficient a company is with their cash
    • EBITDA Margin – shows a companies' operating profitability
    • ROE – shows how well management balances profits, leverage, and assets to make money
    • ROA – shows how effectively a company utilizes its assets to generate profits
    • ROIC – shows how effective the company is at using its money to generate returns
    • Debt/Equity Ratio – shows the financial stability of a company

    More metrics were used due to the increased data set. These stocks were then grouped by industry, and the average of the averages is taken to determine the industry average for the last 5 years; I switched to median based on a few outliers really throwing the average for some of the metrics. If that was confusing, here is an example:

    • 3 stocks that make up an industry averaged -10%, 15%, and 20% ROE over the last 5 years. The median over the last 5 years for that industry is then 15% and all 3 of those stocks will be compared to that benchmark.

    Each stock was compared against its Industry benchmark for each of the metrics and given a score 1=Poor, 2=Good, 3=Great as well as a composite score out of 27. 9 metrics with a max score of 3 in each of the metrics. The scores are based on how much better they are then the average. I measured them against the benchmark using the same methodology as previously performed: Poor < 100%, Good < 150%, Great > 150%. Again, these may be tweaked slightly depending on the particular metric to find a useful distribution.

    I also ranked every stock against the entire list for each of the metrics and overall. For those wondering, the best stock in this ranking was CORT with a score of 2,097 and the worst was CYCN with a score of 23,095. Because the overall rank is a combination of 9 categories with values ranging from 1-2791, the theoretical best a company could do would be 9 and the theoretical worst a company could do would be 25,119. Anyone wondering why the number of stocks doesn't match the original input is primarily due to mergers/acquisitions or the stock being taken private. Another stock was acquired during the analysis, changing the max number yet again.

    Here is an example showing Aerospace & Defense scoring: https://imgur.com/a/fKDYNXE

    Here is an example showing growth scoring (the Revenue Growth column is the company's most recent year): https://imgur.com/a/6hy5NuM

    Here is an example of the visualizations for the data:https://imgur.com/a/bMH98rM

    I applied a series of filters to eliminated unwanted noise. I looked at the top 5 stocks per industry (extending out for any ties), any stock that scored a 25, 26, or 27 on the composite, or any stock that had a high enough overall rank to justify being reviewed.

    Next, I read the description of ~300 stocks and looked through their financials for any inconsistencies, such as one huge year throwing off their average, profit margins higher than operating margins, highly leveraged companies with poor growth, etc. My favorite find was that Chemed Corporation provides hospice/palliative care and owns Roto-Rooter. Yes, I did end up keeping them, no there are not great synergies between the sectors of the business, yes, they are aware of this. I also eliminated industries I wasn't interested in reviewing, such as REITS due to the need to look at different metrics like FFO, Oil and Gas because it's oil and gas, etc. These activities eliminated ~150. I would like to get back to REITs, but I'd need to build a separate model.

    I then looked at each stock in more detail compared to its peers that made the cut. Are all the rest of them in the double digits for growth, are the profit margins substantially less, which one is in a better debt situation, etc. Who deserves to be on this list? This eliminated ~75.

    We were down to 84 stocks at this point. I then attempted to look at each company's investor presentation, annual report, etc. to better understand what the company does, their revenue model, risks, etc. I was not nearly as thorough on this portion this year compared to last year just due to the substantial increase in companies, 26 vs 84. I only eliminated 1 company which left us at the grand total of 83 companies across 31 industries. Breakdown here: https://imgur.com/a/8P9dmd9

    I then purchased all of these in equal proportion a few days ago:

    • AAON
    • AAPL
    • ACN
    • ADBE
    • AEIS
    • ALGN
    • AMAT
    • ANET
    • APH
    • ATR
    • ATVI
    • AX
    • BLD
    • CDNS
    • CGNX
    • CHD
    • CHE
    • CORT
    • CPRT
    • DLB
    • DORM
    • EPAM
    • ESNT
    • ETSY
    • EW
    • EXPD
    • EXPO
    • FAST
    • FB
    • FIX
    • FOXF
    • FTNT
    • GGG
    • GOOG
    • GRMN
    • HEI.A
    • IDA
    • INS
    • INTC
    • INTU
    • IRBT
    • ISRG
    • JCOM
    • KLAC
    • LRCX
    • LULU
    • MASI
    • MED
    • MKSI
    • MKTX
    • MNST
    • MORN
    • MPWR
    • MSFT
    • NMIH
    • NRC
    • NVDA
    • ODFL
    • OLED
    • OLLI
    • PAYC
    • PAYX
    • PRLB
    • QLYS
    • REGN
    • RMR
    • ROAD
    • SCCO
    • SFBS
    • SLP
    • STMP
    • TDY
    • TER
    • TREX
    • TROW
    • TTD
    • TYL
    • UI
    • V
    • VEEV
    • VRTX
    • WAL
    • YETI

    Notes

    • I partnered up for both the 2020 and 2021 experiments. This was critical for both expanding my initial idea, brainstorming methods to build the model, assistance on the code, gathering data, and reviewing for errors. This was a team effort, and I by no means deserve all the credit.
    • All data is shown through close of market 4/30/2021. Took a long time to write all of this up.
    • Unless specified, all returns are showing reinvested dividends in the total return.
    • Interestingly 5 out of the 19 stocks that were eliminated in the last round of the 2020 experiment made it to this year's list. 15 out of 26 of last year's final picks also made it. I'll post an update once I have more than a few data points. If you have any questions, I'll do my best to answer them. Hope you enjoyed the journey.
    • The indexes ended up heavily weighted in tech/semiconductors. This is the way the math pointed me, so that's the way I went.
    • It would be great to be able to run some more thorough regression analysis, but since the math portion only narrows the playing field and a fair amount of the heavy lifting still occurs with individual analysis, this would be pretty much impossible. Creating a model based off past results may also provide a bias that I'm not sure I'd be immune to either.
    • The math is used to find stocks worth reviewing, provide the visualizations to perform comparisons between stocks in the industry and across the full data set to assist with the human analysis.
    • I've seen a fair number of posts along the lines of "How do you find your stocks, how do I find stocks to research, etc." Here are a list of ~100 stocks in a variety of industries you can review if interested. Some you've heard of, some you probably have not.
    • The 2021 stock list makes up 28% of the S&P, with the 59 stocks that are in both lists, due to the market cap ranking.

    *I am not a financial advisor or anything else I should put here to ensure it is clear that I did this for myself and am sharing my results and am in no way forcing you to push buttons to buy things you don't understand or requiring justification for this run on sentence and henceforth. Past results are no guarantee of future returns.

    submitted by /u/FinancialWhoas
    [link] [comments]

    Where do I start?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 10:07 AM PDT

    I have recently decided it's time to buckle down and learn how stocks work. Where do you guys read info on companies that isn't them blowing smoke for the sake of fooling people? What helps you make decisions?

    submitted by /u/IAmWhiteMouse
    [link] [comments]

    Skilz financial statements without revenue?

    Posted: 10 May 2021 08:28 AM PDT

    I'm new to investing. After I heard about their earnings, I wanted to look at specific financial statement. I first went to their website and found quarterly reports that I saw online. However, when I went to SEC.gov, their 10-q filings seemed to be a lot different than Skillz quarterly results?

    https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1801661&owner=exclude

    Also, their filings were under different name, is this becauee Skillz is a blank check company?

    https://investors.skillz.com/financials/sec-filings/default.aspx

    Lastly, does anyone see 10-q for q1 here? it's their official website but only have 8-k for 2021.

    submitted by /u/isaac000316
    [link] [comments]

    Merger Exchange Rate Question - Current example with HRVSF & TCNNF

    Posted: 10 May 2021 09:22 AM PDT

    Here's the current example from which my question stems:

    Trulieve ($TCNNF) announced its buying Harvest (HRVSF). They are issuing something like .1147 TCNNF shares per HRVSF share.

    Most articles are highlighting that based on TCNNF closing price last Friday, this is a 35% premium for Harvest shareholders, equaling approximately a value of $4.79 per HRVSF share (or spiked about 17% at open today).

    My question:

    When the shares convert over, how exactly did that work? Do HRVSF shareholders get an equivalent amount of shares at the price of TCNNF at the time of the announcement, at the time things finalize? Something else?

    If TCNNF price tanks between now and then, could this potentially be a loss instead of this estimated premium?

    Any help explaining this is greatly appreciated.

    For disclosure, i have approx 5k shares of HRVSF. long on weed industry, not necessarily on TCNNF. This is my first merger/ acquisition I've had skin in the game with, so using this current example instead of a hypothetical.

    I won't take any info as financial advice. Just trying to understand the mechanics so I can make my own call.

    Thanks again

    submitted by /u/Less_Education_6809
    [link] [comments]

    Fidelity says I only have 600 shares instead of 1000

    Posted: 10 May 2021 09:22 AM PDT

    I am using active trader pro and purchased 600 shares of company XYZ a few days ago. When I initially purchased the these 600 I accidentally did so with margin but didn't want to long on margin (not sure how long it will take my price target to be met, concerned about fees, interest, etc) so I sold them for a small gain and then repurchased an additional 600 with cash. I bought another 400 today with cash. When I place a sell order for 1000 shares at higher target price in the future it says I have 600 in margin and 400 in cash and will not let me complete the trade. Will this clear up when my cash settles and show I own 1000 shares.

    submitted by /u/Stinkfoot09
    [link] [comments]

    No comments:

    Post a Comment