• Breaking News

    Wednesday, September 25, 2019

    Legal Advice My gym membership was forged

    Legal Advice My gym membership was forged


    My gym membership was forged

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 04:30 AM PDT

    Earlier this year, I registered with ClassPass to hit the gym in New York City. I went to a few gyms, including Crunch Fitness.

    After I canceled my ClassPass membership, I noticed that I was being billed by Crunch Fitness for a membership, which was weird. I contacted their customer support and it took several months until I could actually cancel that gym membership. Since I didn't remember signing up for a gym membership, I asked for a refund, then I would referred to the original guy who registered me - who isn't even working there anymore.

    I finally got one of the customer support reps to give me a copy of the original application -- turns out they fucking FORGED my signature. Not sure how they even got my credit card information - I never actually paid for anything through them. It is possible that they were able to obtain that information through Class Pass. Note at this point, it has already been nine months since I started to get billed and they owe me over $500 - and I still haven't been able to get a refund from them.

    Can I sue? They can't just steal my credit card information and forge my signature. What would be the best way to go about this?

    submitted by /u/todeedee
    [link] [comments]

    Lawyer revoked a court approved disability from abused friend

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 02:09 AM PDT

    Edit: hey, comments have pointed out a lot of missing information so I decided to add a note at the top instead of rearranging the story below because that might confuse newcomers and the ppl that have already tried to help

    "The lawyer" is the social security office.

    The timeframe. First filed over 2 years ago. Judge approved 2 months ago. SS denied it yesterday.

    Her grandma is representing her so shes not completely in the loop of some of the details. She was determined to be incompetent.

    My friend (26f) was abused by her uncle from 5 years old to 16 years old before the family caught him and separated them.

    Edit: bot asked for the location. This is in California.

    She's been seeing a psychiatrist for almost 10 years because since then she is unable to cope with the outside world. She was rarely able to leave her house during that time and a slew of other things but her problem is stressful situations, disagreements with people, conflict in general puts her on the ground in crippling anxiety and/or fear.

    She's been recieving a social security check from something her phych got approved and her phych filed for disability almost a year ago.

    Last week her phych told her that the case finally made it to court and the judge approved it immediately after just a short explanation of the circumstances.

    Yesterday she gets a letter in the mail from a lawyer. Claiming the judge abused his power and her disability is denied. Upon further review reading notes from her phych January 2018 "today she has the cognitive ability to answer questions and communicate appropriately. Also she is alert and aware of her surroundings"

    The lawyer then states this proves she is a capable functioning adult not in need of assistance.

    This is revoking her social security checks as well claiming she is a normal simply because she could speak and listen to her therapist one day.

    Does anyone know of there is a way to challenge this? Simply being able to talk means you aren't disabled? This lawyer is taking everything from her.

    submitted by /u/TheRiftsplitter
    [link] [comments]

    My dad did credit fraud to me

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 04:24 AM PDT

    NEVADA So a year ago my father did credit fraud (opened a credit card under my name) while I was away working in another country. I found out about it during one of my visits back home. Initially, I had decided to report it as credit fraud, but my mom and siblings asked me to instead work it out civilly with him, and I came to an agreement that he'd pay $800 a month so that the card would be paid off in a year. I called the credit card company and explained the situation, but had asked them if they could prevent from any further charges being made to the account, which they said yes (so I assumed I could be paying off the card while the account remained frozen). Fast forward to today, I'm back living in the stated and I come to find out that my father used the card again. I tried to dispute it and now the card company is saying I am responsible because I had come to an agreement with my father a year ago and was therefore accepting responsibility. I'm not on speaking terms with my family anymore and now I have this debt to my name. Is there really nothing I can do to clear my name of this debt?

    submitted by /u/Eeee8888a
    [link] [comments]

    Suicide attempt while on 1:1 suicide watch

    Posted: 24 Sep 2019 05:27 PM PDT

    Long story short, my husband attempted suicide while under 1:1 supervision. His tech was out in the hallway bullshitting on his computer while my husband was alone in the ER room. He had taken his phone back from the bag it was in on the floor, broke it in half, and shoved it in his neck, trying to hit the carotid. The only reason he's still alive is because the shitty iPhone glass kept breaking because his carotid was too thick. He'd been trying to cut it through for about 5 minutes on two separate areas before they noticed his heart rate had skyrocketed and came in to check on him. Do I even have a case here? I get the wound was self-inflicted, but he was there to be in a safe environment from a overdose suicide attempt earlier in the day, and they knew that, hence assigning him to one on one supervision. My husband is better mentally now, thank god, but he hasn't regained sensation on the right side of his neck. I'm just really upset about how the hospital brushed the incident off and was super sketchy about it. Plus, he seriously could have died or had serious mental deficits had he been successful. I live in Utah in the US.

    TL;DR: can you sue a hospital for not really supervising a patient who's supposed to have constant supervision?

    submitted by /u/perriangel
    [link] [comments]

    Several staff are demanding an attorney on the team give his credentials to the volunteer group. He refuses, even to HR

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 06:37 AM PDT

    This may be a dozy so be prepared

    There is a nonprofit volunteer organization in Oklahoma that brought me in to assist with HR.

    There are people across the country involved. Two attorneys are part of the staff as well. One is from New York who's credentials were easy to find and she was more than happy to give information for us to keep with records. The other refuses to give any information or credentials or data. He was already in the group before I joined, and initially I was unaware of this. I just thought "cool, an attorney to help out." Time has passed and now there are members of staff that are demanding he gives proof, even the leader of the organization is struggling and unsure what to do.

    I am asking, is he allowed to do this since we are a non profit? Or does he at least have to have it in record with HR do we can say "we can confirm he is legit attorney." If anyone asks.

    We have been using his legal advice for a time before the other joined, and I'm worried about consequences for our non profit using his advice if it turns out he isn't truly an attorney.

    Edit: For clarification because I realize I've mentioned several states.

    The non profit is in Oklahoma.

    The attorney who does not want to give out information is from Texas.

    submitted by /u/phukkinhell
    [link] [comments]

    My job paid my commission to someone else and said there’s nothing they can do about it.

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 10:30 AM PDT

    Hello everybody. So to start off, I am a 1099 employee for a solar company. I sell residential solar, and I get paid a commission off of every sale I get.

    I have a contract that reflects that I'll be paid out for every sale at the regular rate.

    Basically what happened is this- my old manager was a dirtbag. He constantly had people put sales under his name, claiming it would help us all win a contest, and that we would pay us after he got paid for it.

    Well he was terminated for some very shady business practices, and we've been dealing with the cleanup. One of the things I've dealt with is that I just had a sale that was installed, and was set to be paid out on 9/20. I emailed our company accountant on 9/13, plenty of time before payroll was done, and explained the situation, essentially telling him that it was under my old bosses name, but that it was my sale and I needed to make sure I get paid for my work. He gave me a thumbs up over text when I told him I emailed him.

    9/20 comes, and big surprise, I don't get paid. I text the accountant, and he said he would look into it and call me the next day. As of yesterday, nothing from him. So I went above him and called our CEO, who told me that they accidentally paid it to my old boss, and there was nothing they could do about it because they won't pay it out twice.

    Is there anything I can do about this? I know being a 1099 limits my rights, but I feel I did everything I was supposed to to let them know I was owed that money. It as about $3K that I missed out on because of our accountant's negligence.

    I'm in Arkansas, if that effects my rights. Thank you for any help.

    submitted by /u/ryavco
    [link] [comments]

    [GA] I visited a Chiropractor for my back problem. He "treated" me including aligning my spine, next day I couldn't walk. I found out later I have herniated disc from trauma.

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 07:26 AM PDT

    About 3 weeks ago, I visited a local Chiropractor who my brother recommended. I've had lower back pain after moving few boxes about 2~3 weeks prior to that day, and I wanted to get an X-ray to see if there were any issues with my disc. I explained that to the chiropractor, and he explained I may have had disc bulging or slipped when I first had pains, but by now, it should have slipped back in, and that most of the pain is from the muscle.

    So he doesn't take any first patient forms or anything, but takes me straight to a room with a mechanical massage table, uses one of those electric muscle relaxer, and about 40 minutes later, takes me to a room with one of those table where you can lift up some parts of the table, and push down hard to "align your spine". He did those few times, then poppped my neck and back few times. After few more stretches? he tells me to come back tomorrow.

    I was ok that night, but the next day, I had the worst pain in my life. I could not get up, or sit down. There was only 1 position that felt manageable, and I had to lie down all day. The next day, I went to a different Chiropractor, one who specializes is pain and spinal treatments. He tells me those tables where you lift up and push down your body can be traumatic to a disc patient, and recommended me to get an MRI.

    2 days later, I get an MRI and the doctor who specializes in MRI? says I have 2 herniated discs and 1 bulging disc from a trauma. The only trauma I experienced in my body was that prior Chiropractor. I never fell or was involved in any car accident.

    I have not been able to work for 3 weeks now, and I am slowly getting better, but the pain is still there. The new Chiropractor is really helping me with the pain, as I can now sit down and walk a few steps. But I still have sharp pains in my knee, and sometimes feel numbing sensation.

    I explained to my family, and they think I don't really have a case here for medical malpractice as it's really hard to prove that Chiropractor is the one who caused it, and even if he did, it may be considered he wasn't doing anything medically wrong.

    Is this true or should I go consult a lawyer?

    This is in Atlanta, GA

    submitted by /u/pandalic
    [link] [comments]

    [TX] Got insurance on a car I was going to buy. Deal fell through and the owner wrecked the car in the month while the insurance was still active. Now I got a call saying he hit a house and there has been a claim filed against me.

    Posted: 24 Sep 2019 10:08 PM PDT

    He was not on the insurance, there was no transfer of funds between he and I or transfer of title.

    Am I on the hook for this? If my insurance doesn't cover it can I be personally liable?

    submitted by /u/ubmt1861
    [link] [comments]

    Recently turned 18 and SSI is saying I am a incompetent adult

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 02:55 AM PDT

    So I recently turned 18 and SSI sent me a letter with changes to how much I will receive and it said I am consider a incompetent adult even tho I don't fall under any of the guidelines that would say otherwise. My Payee would still be my mother but I want to know why they would say I am incompetent. I have phycosis(use to have bad paranoia but I am medicated and barely have it anymore) , ptsd (no flash backs or anything hell I don't even think this diagnosis is true) depression and a heart condition (treatrology of fallot) and had a learning disability. I plan on calling like later today but I was wondering if there was someone who could have say I was incompetent and what steps to take to change the status.

    Edit: This is in USA California

    submitted by /u/SicklyHeartChild
    [link] [comments]

    Presidential ballot was forged.

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 09:04 AM PDT

    During the last presidential election I went to my local polling station to place my presidential vote only to find out that I couldn't because someone had already voted on my behalf. Is there any way to clear this up? How can I prevent this from happening again?

    This happened in NYC

    submitted by /u/wigglef_cklr
    [link] [comments]

    If my grandma dies and i was a beneficiary, can my mother legally use that money?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 05:21 AM PDT

    Im in New york, I'm 18. Was looking through our family files, and i come across life insurance papers from when my grandma died (6 years ago) . I saw that i was a beneficiary. I know my mother doesn't have any of that money left, and i also don't remember her ever telling me about a savings account or that my grandma even left me money. i don't want to be greedy, i just want to know if i was actually entitled to the money, or if it could've gone to my mother legally a different way. i know nothing about all of this, sorry if its all over the place

    submitted by /u/cowboybeep-bop
    [link] [comments]

    (TX) Seller/Realtors did not disclose HOA and Title has a N/A in the acknowledgement portion of closing documents. Do I have to pay?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 12:07 PM PDT

    I received a call today from the President of the neighborhood HOA welcoming me to the neighborhood and informing me that we are bound by their rules whether we're "pay-for-voting-privilege" members or are just passive members. I have been anti-HOA for years and made it very clear I did not want to purchase property under and HOA.

    The Seller's Disclosure did not disclose an HOA. The Realtor listing said "No" under the HOA information section. The title paperwork seems to say "N/A" under the HOA section. I can't find any evidence that I was ever informed of this organization. Yet, he told me that they have had to take other residents to court and received judgments in the thousands of dollars multiple times due to breaking of the rules. I believe him as he is also someone I personally know and absolutely is not a liar.

    I am waiting to receive the by-laws and hear back from my realtor before contacting an attorney. However, (from Google) this sounds like a "voluntary HOA" and I'm being pressured to join. Is this a real thing? Am I obligated to pay dues and follow their rules if none of my paperwork disclosed the HOA? What recourse do I have?

    I would not have purchased this home if I had known this beforehand.

    submitted by /u/Ilovmwif1
    [link] [comments]

    I’m on Salary at my company and they just sent out an email stating - Oct. 1st everyone will be required to use an app to track your hours and you will be paid on hours clocked. Is this legal?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 06:54 AM PDT

    I was under the impression that you can't deduct a salaried employees pay based on hours worked in a single day. OKlahoma

    submitted by /u/HonorTheGift
    [link] [comments]

    My rent check was stolen and deposited. BoA, the bank that deposited it, own't return my money. Do I have any recourse?

    Posted: 24 Sep 2019 10:56 PM PDT

    In June, I mailed my rent check to my landlord.

    He called and said he never received it.

    I checked my bank account and it had already been deposited. I inquired with my bank and told them I thought the check was stolen because I could see from the image online that it had not been endorsed (signed on the back). They got back to me and said that because the endorsement didn't exist and there was still money in the receiving account, they would be able to quickly return the money to my account, which they did.

    A few days later, it was taken out again. My bank called me and told me Bank of America, the bank where the check was deposited, denied the claim and refused to return the money. My bank told me BoA thought I had "benefited from the transaction" in some way. My bank said I had to take it up with BoA.

    A bunch of back and forth later, I get the claim number from my bank, get on a call with a rep from BoA, and find out that they can't offer me more details because that would be revealing details about an account I did not own. It's unclear if they meant my bank's relationship with BoA or the account that wrongfully deposited my check. The BoA rep said I basically have no options and my bank has to do something. One option they mentioned was my bank could submit for "reconsideration".

    I don't know what that means and I'm tired of being a football. Are there any tips for navigating this bureaucracy and do I have any legal recourse here?

    Edit: This happened in NYC

    submitted by /u/thrwawaybnks
    [link] [comments]

    Towing company won't let me get my wallet from my car. Can they do that?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 09:56 AM PDT

    I know nothing about law or legal issues, i'm 20.

    Basically, my car was repossessed and i have 10 days to get it back, which i can do. the issue is that my wallet and my tools were in my car. I am a construction worker and I live in Florida. granted, i do care about the tools because they cost so much, i can get by without them. what i cannot get by is not having my ID/Debit Card, which are in my wallet. inside of my car.

    i don't care about the tools i just need my id and money. i found the repo company, called and asked if i could get my wallet so i can have my id from my car. they told me that i would need to pay $100, provide id and have the car keys. i can't pay if you're holding my wallet hostage... they kept saying this robotic response so i went with it. now they say i can't get it until tomorrow after 2pm with an appointment. i can't get into disney to work without an ID. and i can't pay them without my wallet. inside of my car. if i were to go there today, what could i do to get my wallet?

    submitted by /u/Colololl
    [link] [comments]

    What to do if my employer has a policy that prohibits speaking about wages?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 06:53 AM PDT

    Alabama - My employer has a policy stating that under no circumstances should an employee discuss their wage with another employee, regardless of the reason. The punishment for violation is termination of employment.

    Is this legal, and is there a way to report it without getting fired for violating it before reporting?

    submitted by /u/overcomplicatedmess
    [link] [comments]

    [MA] I'm moving from Boston to NYC and my company has agreed to let me work remotely. However, they require I sign this contract... and it's freaking me out a little.

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 06:36 AM PDT

    I am an employee at a tech company in Boston, MA. My partner has gotten a new job in New York City, so we will be moving. I got approval from my managers, the VP of my department, as well as HR to continue my employment remotely. Historically, the company has been extremely remote friendly and we are a partially distributed team. However, as of late, there has been more of a push from upper management to have more employees in the home office. Regardless of that, I was still approved by all parties to work remotely. The majority of my team is remote, from Chicago to Boston to North Carolina, and I already work from home 3 days a week, so this should be a very easy transition for me. We set up video calls for all meetings, and I'm able to do all my work from my laptop.

    My manager mentioned that HR would be writing up an agreement and I would be required to visit the home office in Boston occasionally, which is no problem for me. However, the contract they sent me is a bit worrisome. I've copied it below.

    Overview

    This Telework Agreement is being made between Name and Company, effective Date as a means of business continuity based on the request of the employee, where the alternative would be a resignation of employment with Company.

    This agreement is subject to a ninety (90) day trial period, after such time the Agreement can be extended in ninety (90) day increments, ensuring effectiveness for the business.

    The fact that certain requirements have been incorporated in to this document does not change the nature of your employment status. That is, you continue to be an EMPLOYEE-AT-WILL. The Agreement is merely intended to serve as a guideline for the teleworking arrangement and is not to be construed as a contract of employment. Guidelines may be modified or changed at any time. The Company reserves the right to discontinue the arrangement at any time.

    1. Company reserves the sole and absolute right to grant an Agreement, based upon its analysis of the adaptability and responsibility of the position in question, the business unit's needs, the performance of the employee requesting the arrangement and the work demands placed upon the staff. The arrangement is developed around assigned projects/process needs as well as around position responsibility. Not every job is adaptable to teleworking. Furthermore, circumstances and time may change such adaptability, so there is no guarantee that such an arrangement will be granted or continued. Each business unit has the final decision as to who may participate in these arrangements and may adjust work schedules at any time. In addition, the business retains the right to terminate the arrangements at any time.

    2. Specific arrangements are to be determined by the staff member, human resources, and his/her supervisor and then approved by the Director or Vice President responsible for that unit. It is the responsibility of the department managers to assure that appropriate staff coverage is available at all times to support and interact with clients, customers, colleagues and direct reports.

    3. Participation in this Agreement may impact opportunities for advancement; the employee will continue to be evaluated on his/her ability to perform the duties of the job as currently scoped, however not all positions are adaptable to teleworking.

    4. Failure to maintain satisfactory work performance will result in termination of this Agreement.

    5. This Agreement is not an employee benefit, nor is it intended to be available to all employees. Approval is based on business needs, the employee's performance and good standing and managerial discretion.

    6. All policies and procedures governing employee conduct and performance are in effect for employee's arrangement. Employee must comply with all existing job requirements and company policies and procedures, as well as additional requirements for the arrangement as deemed appropriate by management, including but not limited to visits to Company offices, video meetings, and the like, in an effort to ensure work processes and employee engagement are not compromised.

    7. Employee must maintain a non-disruptive work environment during all scheduled work hours to ensure that they are fully able to complete work assignments in an acceptable and timely manner.

    8. The company will not assume any incremental obligation in providing financial or other resources to support the arrangement (i.e. relocation costs, travel associated with established home office visits, home office set up and functioning needs such as wi-fi, electricity, cell phone, etc. will be at employee's expense). 
    9. If employee is unable to perform job for any reason, including equipment failure, technical issues, workspace limitations, etc., they are expected to report to a company office until the issue is resolved.

    10. Employee will be responsible for your attendance at Department meetings, company meetings, or any other meetings at the Company work location on days that you would otherwise be working from home as requested by management.

    11. Employee is expected to maintain working a full-time schedule, and as such compensation and benefits will remain the same as other employees of like status and are subject to change at the company's discretion. If the company agrees to alter the total number of regularly scheduled weekly hours worked, compensation and benefits may be adjusted to reflect this change.

    12. Reimbursement will not be made for any commuting expenses incurred on days that the employee is required to work in an office.

    13. All equipment and Supplies (i.e. laptop, charger, etc.) furnished by the company remain the property of the company. You are expected to take reasonable precautions to protect company property, in your home or while working remotely, from theft, damage or misuse. When accessing the corporate network, you must only access systems that you are authorized to use. If your laptop does not function, use of a personal computer is prohibited.

    Insurance: You must contact your insurance agent or broker to make certain that your Homeowners or Renters policy adequately covers damage to or theft of the company equipment in your possession as well as your personal liability exposure for the company business pursuits performed remotely.

    Repair: In the event of equipment failure or malfunction, you must notify your manager to ensure immediate repair or replacement.

    Return of company provided Material: All items furnished by the company must be returned upon request, such as in the event of your extended illness, resignation, transfer, or termination of employment, or if the agreement is cancelled. You must agree to provide access to your home to retrieve these items; should you refuse to do so, the company will take whatever legal action is necessary to reclaim its property, data or supplies. Should this become necessary and the company prevails, you agree to pay all costs the company incurs, including attorney fees.

    Use of Personal Equipment: You may use your own equipment limited to your fax, printer/copier, and telephone line, but only with prior management approval. The company assumes no liability for its loss, damage or wear, except if maintenance or modification is required for you to perform your job and you have obtained your manager's prior written approval.

    Purchase of Supplies. If you purchase any supplies on your own, you will be reimbursed only if your manager approved the purchase beforehand and if you request reimbursement in accordance with the company's established procedures.

    1. Your home office must be a separate, designated work area. All equipment must be placed so that it is adequately supported and is in no danger of falling; it must be connected to properly grounded electric outlets with no wiring left in walkways. The company will answer any questions you have about the adequacy/safety of your home work area and can supervise and approve the installation and /or connection of equipment.

    Management has the right to visit your home work area to ensure that you have established adequate safety measures in your home work area. Any such visits will be scheduled in advance.

    No home-related expenses, such as heat, telephone line, cell phone, supplies, equipment, air conditioning or electricity will be reimbursed.

    You will be responsible for determining any income tax implications of maintaining a home office. The company will not provide tax guidance or assume any additional tax liabilities; you are encouraged to consult with a qualified tax professional to discuss the tax implications of this program.

    1. All work-related injuries occurring in your home work area must be reported to your manager immediately. These injuries may be covered under your state's Worker's Compensation Law. The company assumes no responsibility or liability for injuries (including death) to third persons and/ or members of your household that occur in your home either inside or outside the designated work area. The company also assumes no responsibility for damages to your personal property or the company's property that is the result of your negligence or misuse.

    Terminating the Agreement

    The Agreement may be terminated by management at any time. You must provide 30 days written notice to management if you wish to end the Agreement and return to an office location. Similarly, you will receive 30 days' notice if management terminates the arrangement. If for any reason you are unable or unwilling to return to your regular schedule in the original/home office location, you may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination.

    Telework Agreement

    I understand that I will continue to be expected to comply with all of Company's applicable policies and procedures.

    I acknowledge that Company may terminate, amend or modify this work arrangement at any time in its discretion and that no work arrangement is permanent. The company's approval of a telework agreement does not provide a contractual right for its continuance.

    This Agreement does not constitute a contract for any term of employment, and the company's employment relationships remain "at-will," meaning that the employee and the company may terminate the employment relationship at any time.

    I understand that career growth opportunities may be limited while this agreement is in place, and that should I wish for a transfer or promotion to another position, this Agreement will automatically be subject to review.

    The decision to grant a Telework Agreement is within the sole discretion of Company. Employees whose needs for flexibility are a result of a protected disability or situations that may be covered under the law should request consideration for coverage under the relevant company policies via Human Resources, e.g., Family and Medical Leave Act, Temporary Work Restrictions, Disability and Reasonable Accommodation, Acute Treatment, Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action.

    A lot of it reads like a typical employment contract and I understand already that I am an at will employee, and my position could be terminated at any time without cause. However, the part that concerns me is the 90 day trial period, as well as the possibility of the agreement extending every 90 days. I'm familiar with 90 day trial periods at the start of a new job, but I have not experienced an employment relationship where I am continually evaluated every three months. As an employee who reports into the home office, my relationship is not evaluated every 3 months. We have an annual review and goals throughout the year, which lead to promotions or performance bonuses. Not sure if that is synonymous? The way this contract reads to me seems like the first opportunity they get, they may end the relationship, as they have urged many times "many jobs are not appropriate for telecommute" and that this type of relationship may not be appropriate for business needs.

    I guess I'm trying to figure out if I should be concerned that my job is in jeopardy or if by signing this I give my company ammo to terminate my employment simply because they no longer want to support remote work.

    Thanks in advance.

    submitted by /u/remoteEmployeeWut
    [link] [comments]

    Employer claiming faults with a completed contract and refusing payment

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 12:25 PM PDT

    About a year ago, I started a contract for a small startup. I finished it in April and part of the contract was to demonstrate the technology in person. The demo went fine and no issues were brought up. The payment was supposed to be partly a physical asset and partly cash. I have received the physical asset already along with a signed transfer of property document but no cash. It's been about 6 months and the company I'm dealing with decided to, rather than communicate anything, block all communication as soon as the contract was complete. Now that I've had enough waiting and trying to communicate, I went to their office and asked what's going on and they said "[they] are withholding payment". They also brought up things that they are claiming weren't fully correct in the completion of the contract 6 months after it'd already been acknowledged as completed.

    Can they nullify an already acknowledged and completed contract?

    Would I be able to get my payment through a small claims court and if so, would I have to pay the legal fees? Doesn't seem fair that I have to go through all this work AND loose some of the money, let alone time, to get what was already owed for my time under the contract.

    submitted by /u/DSchana
    [link] [comments]

    [VA] Tow company pulled my car into a parked car and caused $2,000 exhaust damage. What steps should I take?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 07:09 AM PDT

    Virginia.

    I had my car towed about 2.5 months ago. My car was still in the parking spot. The operator attached cables to my car while I was in it turning the wheel as he pulled. We were getting very close to another car, so I started to hit the brakes. The truck kept pulling and it pulled into a parked car on the exhaust side. I have pictures.

    Immediately after the accident, it only appeared to be slight body damage to my vehicle, so I offered to take a free tow as long as there was no additional damage to the exhaust system. I asked the mechanic to take a quick look at it. He said there didn't appear to be any additional damage, but because of the work I was having done, they never put the car in air to look underneath.

    Fast forward 2.5 months I'm getting my oil changed, and when they put it up, the first thing they notice is that the tailpipe is bent into the leaf spring and will rub until it develops a hole. A support hanger by the muffler was also bent, and in the mechanic's opinion, was likely caused by the impact.

    Because of the way the parts were messed up and where they are, the only way to really fix it is to replace a good portion of it. The quote is for $2,000.

    submitted by /u/WalkinSteveHawkin
    [link] [comments]

    [Texas] Mandatory safety meeting during unpaid lunch break?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 09:13 AM PDT

    Throwaway for anonymity

    Full time employee, working 7-4 with an hour lunch break. Today when taking lunch, managers told everyone to clock out and come attend a mandatory safety meeting. This is cutting our lunch hour short and we are not getting paid for this time. Is this legal? Advice on how to approach this would be appreciated.

    submitted by /u/t-away4me
    [link] [comments]

    Private US eye clinic nearly blinded my Dad through surgery, then lied about it. What can I do so that people stay away from these crazy people?

    Posted: 24 Sep 2019 09:49 PM PDT

    Long story short, my dad went in for a non-emergency cataract surgery in Virginia. A week after the surgery, he lost vision in one eye. He went back to the clinic and they told him that he had a mini stroke in his sleep causing his retina to detach. They took his blood pressure, noted it as high, gave him medicine as to "prevent blindness from happening in the other eye.

    My dad, a healthy guy that works out regularly, was skeptical so he took his own blood pressure when he got home. Three separate times, all normal. He went to get a second opinion for his eye, and after doing some tests, they couldn't find any signs of a mini stroke, and were led to believe that the surgery was just performed poorly. They recommended he get corrective surgery immediately as the retina only has a certain window before its lost for good.

    THE PRIVATE CLINIC FOUND OUT MY FATHER HAD GOTTEN A SECOND OPINION, AND TRIED TO DISSUADE HIM FROM GETTING THE SURGERY, stating that these other guys had no idea what they were doing. Mind you these other guys were a well respected public clinic in the area. They went further and tried to get my father to wait until the surgeon who performed the surgery, got back from overseas vacation in 7 days. What. The. Fuck.

    My father told them to fuck off, rightfully so, and went ahead with the surgery.

    Now....it would seem that the first private clinic, fucked up the surgery, realized they fucked up, and tried to blame the fuck up on my fathers health. And when he went to get the second opinion, afraid of being found for malpractice, tried to get my father to wait, so that his condition would be incurable and they could blame it on "the mini stroke."

    My father wants to wait until everything heals before even considering suing, and all the stress that comes with that, but what can I do in the meantime so people stay away from this crazy clinic?

    I'm obviously beyond furious, but would like to prevent this clinic from taking advantage of other people like that.

    TLDR; They nearly blinded my father, and then fucking lied about it. How can I get the word out that maybe people should consider another eye clinic?

    Edit: Added location.

    submitted by /u/AzorianMiles1
    [link] [comments]

    Is it legal for my job to withhold wages that I earned?

    Posted: 25 Sep 2019 08:12 AM PDT

    I work in the state of Missouri for a company that pays commission but I'm not a 1099 employee.

    My company does "claw backs", meaning that if I sell business that doesn't stay on the books for at least 1 month, they'll deduct what I was paid off of my next check.

    Yesterday, we found out that they're going to start withholding 15% of every paycheck and put those funds into what they're calling a "piggy bank". That way any claw backs that we may have in the future can be withdrawn from our reserve funds. It's a rolling 3 month window. So if I still have money in my "piggy bank" at the end of that quarter, I get a check for that amount.

    If we quit our job before the end of the quarter, we will not be paid for any remaining funds that we have in our piggy bank.

    1. Is it legal for them not to pay us on wages that we rightfully earned?
    2. Do we not have the right to opt out of them withholding 15% of every paycheck? I'd rather get my full paycheck and choose how much I'm going to put aside for claw backs, if any at all. I'd like to make interest off of that money instead of my company making interest off of everyone's money they withheld.

    I don't know who to contact? The Department of Labor?

    submitted by /u/FernDogs
    [link] [comments]

    No comments:

    Post a Comment