Stock Market - Ford, Adidas and Denny’s join the growing list of companies pausing Facebook ad spending |
- Ford, Adidas and Denny’s join the growing list of companies pausing Facebook ad spending
- VXRT Covid Play
- Top 5 Things To Know In The Stock Market This Week
- Tech sector sell off?
- Diversification of Portfolio: what sectors should I look into?
- What are your favorite tools or indicators? (social sentiment, Bollinger Bands, etc.)
- What is Boeing Stock actually worth right now?
- Anyone have thoughts on GPAQ? Friend of mine told me about it. Stock doesn’t have much volume on a daily basis and the company is looking to give some incentives for investors.
- Etf investing for a 15 year old
- Good courses to learn basics of stock trading?
- Why nothing matters to the Stock Market anymore
- Which browser based chart services have the ability to compare 2 charts where one can be zeroed?
- Is there any website that will let me see the performance of a basket of stocks?
- Choosing broker
- BKS shareholders
- How did you start? (Stock market)
- CD Projekt Red
- Double Stop Loss Order
- PRVB Catalyst..?
- Chesapeake Energy Impacts?
- Why not SHTDY?
- Watchlist: 6/29 Short Week Ahead
| Ford, Adidas and Denny’s join the growing list of companies pausing Facebook ad spending Posted: 29 Jun 2020 01:27 PM PDT https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/29/facebook-july-ad-suspension-ford-adidas-and-dennys-joim.html Companies are continuing to sign onto a Facebook advertising boycott. Ford, Adidas, and Denny's are among the latest. So far, none of the advertisers are in the top spenders on Facebook this year, according to Pathmatics. [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 06:16 AM PDT Vaxart (VXRT) - COVID Vaccine play Who is Vaxart? I'm not going to boring you with the technical jargon. In another shell, Vaxart is a clinical-stage company engaging in the discovery and development of oral vaccines. They currently have several vaccines for other matters being developed. Why Vaxart? Vaxart was among several selected companies to partake in "Operation Warp Speed (OWS)". OWS aims to deliver 300 MILLION doses of a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine by January 2021. To touch in OWS real quick; OWS is a collaborated effort by the CDC, FDA, NIH, BARDA, and DoD. Funding is coming from Congress, whom directed almost $10 BILLION to the project. OWS has other companies working on a vaccine, along with Vaxart. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2020/06/16/fact-sheet-explaining-operation-warp-speed.html Speaking of the other companies, they're all working on an injection based vaccine. Vaxart is going outside the box to a pill, or tablet form. Why is this so special? Tablets are shelf-stable. Meaning, they do not need special transport and do not need refrigerated. This provides cost savings, as well as easier global distribution. There is also preliminary clinical research that shows Vaxart's tablets cause less side effects and prevents illnesses more effectively as opposed to an injection-based vaccine. Now you're asking; but what if another company develops a vaccine first?! Ahhh, I've go you covered. Well, because Vaxart is developing a tablet vaccine for COVID, it may still be a dominant force due to, again, cost savings and ease of distribution/storage. Also, if you need re-dosing, its easier to re-dose with a pill rather than injection. It must be noted that Vaxart is beginning its Phase 1 primate trials soon. "Expect Vaxart's stock to get a bump whenever it releases preliminary clinical trial data in any of its vaccine trials. Each positive piece of clinical trial evidence validates the merit of Vaxart's oral-vaccine platform, and investors should assume that the market will react accordingly." https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/06/27/smart-investors-might-consider-buying-this-corona.aspx "As a biotech start-up, Vaxart has no products on the market and trailing-12-month revenue of only $7.36 million. Nonetheless, its COVID-19 vaccine program is promising enough that the company is planning ahead for large-scale manufacturing of vaccine components, to support clinical trial operations in the near future." "Between VBI Vaccines and Vaxart, Vaxart is better positioned for stock growth stemming from its COVID-19 vaccine development program. The company's stock has already surged several times after new announcements about manufacturing scale-up, and positive news about the efficacy of its vaccine would likely raise share prices even more. In contrast, VBI appears to be struggling with its own manufacturing scale-up for clinical operations, leaving its COVID-19 vaccine candidate even further from the market than Vaxart's." https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/06/27/better-coronavirus-stock-vbi-vaccines-or-vaxart.aspx And as we must always save the best for last. Here is an article that goes into detail as to why Vaxart is better than the competition. Published Sunday night. ---Conclusion--- Vaxart is on the fast track for a solid COVID vaccine. The very killer of the global economy and our livelihoods. If they manage to find a vaccine, imagine what positive impacts this can have on the, most importantly, the world, but also, the economy. If you have any concerns, I'd love to hear them! Thank you. I am merely providing facts and am not encouraging anyone to buy/sell any stocks. Any purchase or sell of any stocks is your responsibility only. [link] [comments]  |
| Top 5 Things To Know In The Stock Market This Week Posted: 29 Jun 2020 05:41 AM PDT Coronavirus News Feeds Continue To Be The Main HighlightsIn Asia today, stocks are plunging as a resurgence in coronavirus cases shakes optimism for a swift economic recovery. Global coronavirus cases exceeded 10 million on Sunday and the death toll surpassed 500,000 people. Investors increasingly worry that economic reopening globally would not be easy and economic recovery may be weak. This is because of the recent rebound of coronavirus cases after the lockdown measures eased. For this reason, investors are getting more cautious and re-evaluating the risks to the stock market. US Stock Futures Fluctuate As Virus Infections Top 10 MillionStock futures sank on Sunday evening as a rising number of states across the country reimposed social distancing standards to try and curb increases in coronavirus spreads. Dow futures slid 700 points, or 2.3% after cities and states hit with a resurgence of coronavirus infections, further disrupting business activity. Since then, more cities rolled back the reopening plans over the weekend. We have been expecting a smooth rebound across the whole economy, and when things like that happen, we could expect some volatility across the market in the near-term. S&P 500 futures took the bids near 3,012, up 0.2% on a day, during the initial Tokyo session on Monday. The bounce-back could simply be due to news of a potential Covid-19 cure. Sinopharm Group, a major Asian drug manufacturer, mentioned that its second vaccine showed positive safety and generated a high concentration of antibodies among participants in phase I and II clinical trials. Nasdaq futures are also edging lower amid the resurgence of coronavirus concerns. With the recent advertising boycott of Facebook (FB Stock Report) by a number of companies, it is not surprising to see the stock dragging the index lower. After all, Facebook is the fifth-largest company within the index. Nikola Is Open For PreOrders TodaySince Nikola (NKLA Stock Report) went public at the beginning of this month, the stock has been hovering around the $60-$75 price range. The company has its fair share of bulls and bears with regards to the projections of its future growth. After a one month wait, reservations are open today for the Badger, a hydrogen-electric pickup truck. I guess the reservation numbers will provide some clarification on the company's prospects. The Badger aims directly after Ford's F-150 and Tesla's Cybertruck. Would the Badger be able to live up to its hype? You tell me. US Federal Reserve's Minutes & Unemployment DataInvestors are closely watching the market as the minutes of Fed's most recent monetary policy meeting will be released on Wednesday. During the press conference following the meeting, Fed Chairman Jay Powell gave a bleak assessment of coronavirus's economic effects. He made clear that there would be no increase in interest rates in the near future. The minutes should deliver further details on Wednesday. Those include the committee's view of the prospects for a full recovery and the measures it is considering to stave off further damage. The unemployment data that is forthcoming this Thursday is the most obvious indicator of economic health. After the record loss of 20 million jobs in April, expectations were high that May's non-farm payrolls would continue to deteriorate. But that's not the case for May, which saw the addition of 2.5 million jobs. The question here is, can we expect the trend from May to continue? Or should we expect the trend from April to resume now that there's a spike in infections? U.S. Markets Are Closed On Independence Day 2020We are going to have a long weekend ahead. The U.S. stock market will be closed this coming Friday. But before that, there are also a few companies that are reporting their earnings this week. Of those that are reporting, these are a few stocks that investors are paying close attention to. Among them are Micron Technologies (MU Stock Report), Constellation Brands (STZ Stock Report), FedEx (FDX Stock Report) and General Mills (GIS Stock Report). [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 08:44 AM PDT Good morning everyone. I have a few basic questions: I am a very heavy tech investor - DDOG, OKTA, CRWD, NET, CRM, and today I am watching all the stocks take a 2-3% hit. My two questions are this:
[link] [comments]  |
| Diversification of Portfolio: what sectors should I look into? Posted: 29 Jun 2020 01:54 PM PDT I set up an account back in May, and have been pretty hesitant dumping all my money in due to the uncertain economic outlook from everything right now. I haven't been super serious and have put in about 500 bucks in Disney/ Bank of America and forgot about it, as I had an opportunity of getting a pretty good summer job that would get me far more money than investing would in the short term. I got the job, made some money, and am ready to start investing income. So far I've invested $1,000 of my money into Bank of America, have 5 Disney shares which I've taken a bit of a loss on, and bought Facebook and Apple on Friday. Every night, I've been researching about 10 companies off of a list of the Dow Jones S&P 500 to get some ideas for some long term stuff, but I'm not quite sure how to figure out what sectors should be a focus for long term/ decent yearly gains. What sectors are you guys focusing on? What sectors are super overvalued and should generally be avoided? [link] [comments]  |
| What are your favorite tools or indicators? (social sentiment, Bollinger Bands, etc.) Posted: 29 Jun 2020 08:59 PM PDT |
| What is Boeing Stock actually worth right now? Posted: 29 Jun 2020 11:41 AM PDT FAA test flights today are encouraging speculation, but with an election that may go democrat (less military spending) and increasing covid cases, I'm having a hard time justifying it rallying to the degree it has today. Any thoughts? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 07:46 PM PDT There is a merger vote at 10am tomorrow and the proposal would result in 1 share of GPAQ equating to 1.42 shares of HOFV. I attached an article. Please let me know if anyone has thoughts good or bad? Almost seems too good to be true - management has 52% majority vote so could approve the merger. Here is link: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1708176/000121390020013710/ea122496ex99-1_gordonpointe.htm [link] [comments]  |
| Etf investing for a 15 year old Posted: 29 Jun 2020 07:31 PM PDT Ok I'm trying to set something straight in my mind and I'd like your help trying to figure this out. Say I invest $300 a month into a given etf and I keep doing that for 5 years. At the end of the 5 years the etf is up $50 from my first initial investment. Can someone tell me how much is stand to make from that? [link] [comments]  |
| Good courses to learn basics of stock trading? Posted: 29 Jun 2020 07:26 PM PDT hi r/StockMarket - I'm looking for a course on how to trade stocks for semi-beginners. There are tons of articles out there but looking for something more comprehensive and detailed. I know how to read a P&L but want to know the <insert number> of factors I should look at like PE, Market cap, etc and why they're important. Thanks. [link] [comments]  |
| Why nothing matters to the Stock Market anymore Posted: 29 Jun 2020 03:35 PM PDT 3 words. Discounted Cash Flow. When you buy a stock you are not merely buying it for the next quarter or however long until you plan to sell it (that becomes important later) rather you are buying it for all the time it will exist until the heat death of the universe or it gets bought out or goes bankrupt, whichever comes first. But can't you sell them at anytime? Yes but you will be selling them to someone who will be holding the bag until the heat death of the universe, and even if they plan on selling soon, unless they believe in the greater fool theory where they can hand their bag off to some robinhood user, they need to believe that the bag is worth holding forever. Thus you need to valuate a stock as if you will be holding it forever even if you don't plan on that. In theory there always needs to be somebody holding the bag at any given time, so in theory (read sans robinhood) the price of the bag will always reflect what it will be worth holding until the bag disappears, and the stock market is merely a vehicle in which we exchange the particular bags particular people are holding, but somebody must always be holding the bag so the value ought to eventually reflect what holding that bag is worth. So if a stock is worth all the money it can make you until the heat death of the universe, if they will be profitably forever shouldn't they be infinitely valuable? Yes, however there are risks that it won't be profitable forever, and so these risks ought to be priced in. If there was no risk, like say a government bond where JPow can literally just create money out of thin air to make sure the government has money to pay its bills, then you could probably evaluate it as risk free. So holding a government bond is basically the same thing as holding an infinite amount of money because it is always going to grow? Yes but on the road to infinity you might want to move that money into something that gets to infinity faster because you are impatient, and you might just be willing to take a bit of risk on it not getting to infinity to do this. Thus in order to invest in something other than government bonds, the thing needs to get to infinity faster at a rate that compensates for the added risk. In order to evaluate if it is worth it, you need to compare the money you will make off the alternative investment to what you could make risk free from a government bond. Thus if you make 2% of the alternative and government bond gets you 1%, you really are only making 1% for all that risk you are taking. So a discounted cash flow is how much money the company can make you divided by how much a government bond could make you. But you aren't doing this for a single year, you are doing it for all years, so it is the sum of all years cash flows divided by what the government bond would have made you by that year. So a $100 government bond is worth $101 at a 1% interest rate after 1 year, and $102.01 after 2 years, etc. The discounted cash flow is how much you think the company will make after 1 year divided by 1.01 + how much you think it will make in the second year divided by 1.0201, and then continue until the aliens get bored of watching us and just put us out of our misery. But you might say you don't get that cash flow from owning the stock, the company will keep it. While that is true what must be understood is that in theory you own the company when you own the stock so in theory you are getting all that money, its just you are theoretically deciding to keep it with the business in the hopes the business will use it productively. In theory you could just send all that cash flow to yourself so that is what we base things off. What this all means is that even if a company makes $100 every year, its discounted cash flow at a 1% interest rate is $99.01 in the first year, $98.03 in the second, $97.06 in y3, $96.10 in y4, $95.15 in y5. Thus even if on the first year it actually made $0 rather than $100, this really doesn't matter at a 1% interest rate because future earnings 69 years down the road are still worth $50 when discounted at 1%, The 69th and 70th year earnings combined are just as valuable as the 0th year earnings at a 1% discount rate. Lets say though that we only count 5 years into the future, normally it would make $585.35 in those 5 years. Cutting out the first $99.01 makes it only $386.34. What this means is that by losing its first year earnings the company dropped in value from $485.35 to $38 which is a 20.4% loss in value from a 100% loss in profit for the year. With a 10% discount rate though, the first year is $90.91, y2 is $82.64, y3 is $75.13, y4 is $68.03, y5 is $62.09. Rather than the 69th and 70th years being as valuable as the 0th year, the 50% line is cross by the 7th and 8th year at 10%. Losing the $90.91 from the first years brings the total for the 5 years from $378.80 down to $287.89, which is a 24% loss in value from losing the first year. The difference in the hair cut from 20.4% to 24% for a 5 year time frame of losing 1 year does not seem that great, but if you paid attention closely, the valuation itself in a 1% interest rate environment was a lot higher than the 10% interest rate environment. What this means is that it a 1% interest rate environment, a company that loses the entirety of its first year earnings is more valuable ($386.34) the a company that retains its 1st year earnings in a 10% environment ($378.80). Thus if interest rates drop from 10% to 1%, and the company will exist for 5 years, with the trade off being that interest rates were dropped because of something that wiped out the first year of earnings, the company is still worth more despite losing a year of earnings simply because the interest rates fell. Now the interest rates did not fall from 10% to 1% so it was not that extreme, but the time frame these companies will exist is longer than 5 years, so the first year earnings is less substantial for the total value of the company. We went from a 10-year bond yield of about 1.5% to 0.75% but if you expect earnings to grow in the long term then the time frame is nearly infinite. In fact I would argue that in an environment where interest rates are so low the only thing that matters is how much money can be made in the long term, which is why companies like Amazon or Tesla can have such ridiculous valuations, cause whiles its PE is currently 200, you aren't actually missing out on all that much while you are waiting for its earnings to grow. Since everyone else knows these stocks can comfortably trade on their future earnings with very little discounting because everyone else also knows they don't lose out on much by waiting, the price can remain high so long as future earnings are not heavily discounted in comparison to current earnings. JPOW says that the interest rates will remain this low until 2022 so stocks will continue to trade as if earnings in 2022 are just as valuable as earnings in 2020, because they are only (1.0075^3 -> 1.023) 2.3% less valuable. Of course there is a chance that after 2022 the interest rates might increase, in which case earnings in 2025 might be discounted more heavily, but even if you thought interest rates would need to go up to like 20% or something after 2022 and thus any future earnings might as not be considered, just from those 3 years alone, losing the first year's earnings only translates to a 33% loss in the total value. The bear market in 2018 was mostly the result of the 10-year bond rate going up above 3%. People believed that it might stay that high for a considerable amount of time, and thus people needed to reevaluate the discounting rate, and suddenly stocks that were trading based on future earnings were over priced as those future earnings will less valuable. Now that we know interest rates are going to be at 0.75% for the foreseeable future, it makes sense to evaluate stuff from this new discount rate, which results in things which will have high earnings later on shooting up in value as those future earnings will not be discounted as heavily. This revaluation from 1.5% to 0.75% resulted in future heavy stocks going up in value even if their current earnings went into the toilet. Thus the NASDAQ is trading higher than it was before the crash because that trades with the expectation that earnings in 10 years will be substantially higher than they are today so today's earning basically don't matter at all. S&P500 is trading a little bit lower than it was before, and this is because while earnings will likely be lower for this year, they will probably recover soon, so while this year is a write off, because interest rates are so low that write off is only losing 1 year out of many so the loss is less substantial. In total what this means is that any temporary setback is pretty much irrelevant for the long term value of something, so stocks really aren't going to be trading based on anything that is happening today so people should stop acting like the market is going to crash because of something that happened this week. The initial market crash happened because people needed to reevaluate what the future was going to look like, now we no longer need to reevaluate the future. We know exactly how shit things are going to be for the next while, the future isn't going to look substantially worse just because OMG second wave incoming!!. It might make people think lockdowns will last longer, but all that means is people will be writing off 2 years rather than 1 year. This only substantially decreases the value of something if you think its long term earnings will be affected by a pro-longed lockdown, and unless having to write off 2 years of earnings rather than 1 caused the company to go to zero (bankruptcy), its long term earnings will not be substantially impacted by 2 years losses vs 1 year. What substantially matters is how their long term earnings will be impacted. The reason Buffet sold his airlines is because buffet thinks air travel is going to be permanently affected by this like how it was permanently affected by 9/11. People are trading based on how they think a company is going to do in the long term, not how it is going to do based on the next quarter. The longer interest rates stay low, the longer term people are going to be trading based on. Stocks have likely already priced in the low-interest rates, so we shouldn't expect them to increase in value simply because its future earnings are being discounted by less, but neither should we freak out and think that stocks are going to drop by as much as in march just because OMG SECOND WAVE !?! Everything is priced in, nothing that happens today matters, all that matters is how things that happen today impact the long term viability of a company because earnings in 2022 are just as valuable as earnings today when interest rates are basically zero. The S&P500 being about 10% lower than it was in February is an indication that people believe that the cumulative output of the economy is going to be about 10% lower over the course of the next few years than it was going to be before the lock down occurred, which honestly seems about reasonable. As time goes on even if we don't know how long lockdown is going to last, the future is going to look better because more or the deepest parts of the lockdown are being placed behind us. You don't need to include lost past earnings in your future calculation of what something is worth, past earnings are only relevant insofar as they can give you an idea of what future earnings might be. The more we place bad earnings behind us, the less those bad earnings need to be included in the future calculation of what something is worth, so the cumulative view of the future becomes better the more hard times are put behind us unless we have a good reason to believe those hard time indicate worse times might be coming. Right now confirmation we are going through a hard time does not indicate things are going to be worse so "OMG crash when Q2/Q3 earnings comes out and we haven't recovered all the lost earnings yet" isn't going to happen. All the mini-crashes we have been experiencing have been corrections that come from over-estimating the pace of recovery. Things simply shouldn't be going up as fast as they have, but if you follow a straight-ish line from April before things started to get ahead of themselves, S&P500 being at 3000 at this point follows the gradual upward trajectory that it should be going on if we were to assume it should be going up at around the same pace but at a lower baseline than before the lockdown. Things being lockedown means many industries have been knocked down so the economy will be smaller as a result, but despite the lockdown other sections of the economy are going to continue moving, its not like we have been in stasis for all these months. The economy is smaller than it was, but that smaller economy is growing like it would have done before because its not like you can lose the entire airline industry continuously, it happens once, the economy takes the hit, and it moves forward at its lower level. The stock market getting ahead of itself is nothing new. In the beginning of 2018 there was an acceleration of the growth of the market followed by a mini-crash and then some volatility before the market founds its growth rate again before the interest rate increases of 2018 resulted in a bear market as a permanent (at least they thought so at the time) reevaluation of the discount rate needed to be done. Basically since 1982, it always looked as if the 10-year government bond interest rate was going to be going down even if it was temporarily be going up, but in 2018 if you forget the fact that it later went down even more, it actually looked like the trend had reversed itself, and that a bottom for government debt interest rates had been reached in 2016 and it was only going to go up from here. This is something that was true in 2007 as well as the graph from that time appears as if the bottom was in 2003. In 2000 it looked as if the 10-year bond yield had gone down to the 1965 level for the first time and it seemed as if it was only going to be going up. The things these 3 bear markets had in common is they happened some years after it looked as if the yields had reached all-time or multi-decade lows, but then for awhile after that the yields had been going up and so looked like they would just keep going up. The yields going up makes people need to re-evaluate the discounting rate which means stocks that were priced according to the low discount rate are now overvalued. They can only remain that valued if you believe that the discount rate is going to continue to drop instead of going up from their previous low a couple years before. If you think there is a good chance the risk free interest rate is going to continue to go up then the high valuations cannot last. What this means is that we should expect a crash not now when 10-year government bond rates are at all time lows, but rather we should expect a crash when the yields have been going up for a considerable amount of time such that people expect them to stay permanently higher than their previous low. Inflation adjusted the cheapest time to buy stocks based on Wilshire 5000 to GDP was from 1975-1982, which it is no surprise was also when 10-year government bond was rising and reached a peak in 1981. If you follow an inflation adjusted S&P500 graph, it reached a peak about in the mid 1960s, before when adjusted for inflation it actually declined until 1982, which coincides with the 10-year bond yield increasing. Then as the 10-year bond yield decreased from 1982, the stock market just continued and continued to get more expensive Wilshire 5000 to GDP https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=qLC 10-Year Government Bond https://www.macrotrends.net/2016/10-year-treasury-bond-rate-yield-chart S&P500 adjusted for inflation https://www.macrotrends.net/2324/sp-500-historical-chart-data Thus the stock market will continue to continue to be historically expensive so long as people do not think the 10-year bond yield is going to increase in a permanent fashion from its historic lows. To prove I'm not a crazy person connecting red thumbtacks on a bristol board thinking I figured everything out asking you to "dude just trust me", this is a video in 2019 of Buffet and Gates claiming stocks (at all time highs) were ridiculously cheap if interest rates stayed that low (they got lower). What happened since then is the economy took a massive hit, but 10-year bond yields went even lower so that partially canceled things out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIslBZxp5zQ [link] [comments]  |
| Which browser based chart services have the ability to compare 2 charts where one can be zeroed? Posted: 29 Jun 2020 06:09 PM PDT For example. If I choose a certain stock and compared it to SP500 index and have the index zeroed, then I can see clearly how well the stock is doing vs the SP 500. Is there a free in browser chart service that can do that? What I'm trying get to is a Mansfield Chart. All the services I checked from BarCharts to TradingView to Yahoo don't seem to have it. The closest that I have seen is just 2 charts compared with a % scale. [link] [comments]  |
| Is there any website that will let me see the performance of a basket of stocks? Posted: 29 Jun 2020 04:20 PM PDT I know that there are brokerages that let you create your own ETFs but I just want to be able to see the performance of multiple different baskets of stocks without having to invest any money. Say you have three baskets of stocks. Basket A, B, and C. basket A consists of AAPL, UNH, and MA; basket B consists of FB, AMD, and NVDA; and basket C consists of MCD, SBUX, and NKE. Is there a website that would show me the daily percentage increase or decrease of each individual basket? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 01:41 PM PDT Hey guys, I'm quite new at this. I'm looking at some brokers and below their name it says "79% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider". I'm googling CFD and I can't really understand the meaning of it. Does that simply mean that 79% of the people who use the broker end up losing their money? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 01:17 PM PDT Hi all I have a friend that said her parents bought some stock in her name as a kid in a custodian account. They're not on the best speaking terms, and neither have been doing a great job keeping track of stock. I saw that in 2019 BKS Barnes and Noble was bought out by a hedge fund. What exactly does that mean, and what happened to her shares of BKS? [link] [comments]  |
| How did you start? (Stock market) Posted: 29 Jun 2020 12:29 PM PDT Hi all. I am not sure if this belongs here, but I am looking for some story's about how you guys got involved in buying/selling stocks. Mainly how you started out but would appreciate if you can share experiences of success or failure. Any books you could recommend would also be greatly appreciated. Many thanks. [Edit]: Book and App recommendations would also be greatly appreciated. [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 10:37 AM PDT Anyone know where to buy stocks for the polish game development company CD Projekt Red? I'd like to invest in them but I cannot find them on most of the main stock market apps. [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 10:05 AM PDT Hi all, Due to recent market volatility, I've been thinking of a way to enter into a double stop-limit loss order using Interactive Brokers. Purely hypothetical example: two stop-limit orders for AAPL @ 300 and 290. If my first stop-limit order executes, my second stop-limit order automatically cancels. Is there a way to do this using IB? I do not wish to use a stop-market order. Many thanks and trade safe. [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 05:50 AM PDT Provention Bio Announces Inclusion in the Russell 3000 Index and Russell 2000 Index Published: Jun 29, 2020 OLDWICK, N.J., June 29, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Provention Bio, Inc., (Nasdaq: PRVB), a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to intercepting and preventing immune-mediated diseases, today announced that it has been added to the broad-market Russell 3000® Index and the small-cap Russell 2000® Index as part of the Russell US Indexes annual reconstitution. (PRNewsfoto/Provention Bio, Inc.) Annual Russell indexes reconstitution captures the 4,000 largest US stocks as of May 8, 2020 ranking them by total market capitalization. Membership in the US all-cap Russell 3000® Index, which remains in place for one year, means automatic inclusion in the large-cap Russell 1000® Index or small-cap Russell 2000® Index as well as the appropriate growth and value style indexes. FTSE Russell determines membership for its Russell indexes primarily by objective, market-capitalization rankings and style attributes. Russell indexes are widely used by investment managers and institutional investors for index funds and as benchmarks for active investment strategies. Approximately $9 trillion in assets are benchmarked against Russell's US indexes. Russell indexes are part of FTSE Russell, a leading global index provider. Provention Bio, Inc. (Nasdaq: PRVB) is a biopharmaceutical company leveraging a transformational drug development strategy focused on the prevention or interception of immune-mediated disease. Provention's mission is to source, transform and develop therapeutic candidates targeting the high morbidity, mortality and escalating costs of autoimmune diseases. Provention's diversified portfolio includes teplizumab, a pre-commercial-stage candidate that has been shown to delay the onset of insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes (T1D) in at-risk patients during the presymptomatic phase of the disease. The Company's portfolio includes additional clinical product development candidates that have demonstrated proof-of-mechanism and/or proof-of-concept in other autoimmune diseases, including celiac disease and lupus. [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 28 Jun 2020 11:44 PM PDT What impact will the bankruptcy have on companies like CEQP, NBLX, OAS , CPE? Are we looking at a significant impact that will shake the sector for good or for worse? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 29 Jun 2020 09:19 AM PDT Over the past week, Sinopharm has released two pieces of good news in relation to its COVID-19 efforts. Is there any reason we shouldn't bet on this company? The way I see it, the vaccine is actually successful, or people buy into the hype raising the price anyway. Looking to be challenged and shown why this isn't a smart play. Thanks! [link] [comments]  |
| Watchlist: 6/29 Short Week Ahead Posted: 29 Jun 2020 04:34 AM PDT Market Notes: Virus cases continue to spike across the country. While the weekend had some "news" there was nothing truly new. The old headlines are still intact, virus, protests, politics. We are starting off a short trading week, holiday observation is Friday. Quarter 2 is ending tomorrow. Futures are choppy but higher at writing. I think we will have a choppy week with plenty of opportunities. Watchlist: LEDS is a low float, resistance at $4 ANY is a low float, support is at $3 CBLI is a low float, way down in the pre-market. I'm watching for it to rebound to $5 ELA is a low float, resistance at $5 GRAF is a low float SPAC moving on news, on watch BLNK is a low float with resistance ta $3.40 AFMD has resistance at $4.75 WKHS likely has support at $10.30 DVAX resistance at $9 [link] [comments]  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from r/StockMarket - Reddit's front page of the stock market, financial news. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment