Business AT&T fined $60 million for throttling ‘unlimited’ data plans |
- AT&T fined $60 million for throttling ‘unlimited’ data plans
- AT&T to pay $60 million for allegedly misleading customers about 'unlimited' data plans
- Fired McDonald's CEO could see $70 million payout after co-worker affair
- Walmart appears to be gaining ground against Amazon
- The IRS has granted nonprofit status to a daily newspaper for the first time
- A new Gallup study released Thursday sheds new light on worker-manager relationships, finding that about 50% of the 7,200 adults surveyed left a job “to get away from their manager.”
- Airbnb bans 'party houses' in a move to improve safety
- Uber stock price falls after 3Q earnings shows $1 billion loss
- Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
- German government expands subsidies for electric cars
- Employee Time Tracking - The Handbook
- Using a job offer as leverage for higher pay
- Constantly late with work? Blame the planning fallacy
- Best no income tax state to form an LLC
- What if I paid full for any phone of you’re choice?
- Start-Up Company Owners Talk About the Changes Going on After the Exit
- Tech Mahindra buys US based media group Born
- Why appraisals are pointless for most people
- Would Conflict Of Personal Interests Stop You Doing Business With Someone?
- How do I start to go up against a monopoly?
- Saudi Arabia finally pays WWE for ‘Crown Jewel’ broadcasts
- AT&T to pay $60 million in settlement for slowing cellphone data on unlimited plans
- I use to make money only from dividends, chasing large ETF? Am I the only one who was doing this?
AT&T fined $60 million for throttling ‘unlimited’ data plans Posted: 05 Nov 2019 10:18 AM PST |
AT&T to pay $60 million for allegedly misleading customers about 'unlimited' data plans Posted: 05 Nov 2019 11:06 AM PST |
Fired McDonald's CEO could see $70 million payout after co-worker affair Posted: 05 Nov 2019 11:28 AM PST |
Walmart appears to be gaining ground against Amazon Posted: 05 Nov 2019 07:44 AM PST |
The IRS has granted nonprofit status to a daily newspaper for the first time Posted: 05 Nov 2019 05:21 AM PST |
Posted: 05 Nov 2019 02:43 AM PST |
Airbnb bans 'party houses' in a move to improve safety Posted: 05 Nov 2019 04:18 AM PST |
Uber stock price falls after 3Q earnings shows $1 billion loss Posted: 05 Nov 2019 06:43 AM PST |
Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP Posted: 05 Nov 2019 11:26 PM PST |
German government expands subsidies for electric cars Posted: 05 Nov 2019 01:12 PM PST |
Employee Time Tracking - The Handbook Posted: 06 Nov 2019 01:59 AM PST |
Using a job offer as leverage for higher pay Posted: 05 Nov 2019 07:15 PM PST I'm not sure if this is the right place for this, but I have questions about using a job offer as leverage for higher pay in your current position. Is this a common/ethical thing to do? My boss is looking to hire someone for our team, and one of my friends applied for the position. My boss is planning on offering him the job, and I found out that he's not actually interested in the job, and is planning to use the job offer to get higher pay at his job. This seems super shady to me, and I was thinking about telling my boss so he can offer the job to someone who's actually interested. Thoughts?? [link] [comments] |
Constantly late with work? Blame the planning fallacy Posted: 05 Nov 2019 03:42 PM PST |
Best no income tax state to form an LLC Posted: 05 Nov 2019 10:30 PM PST Is there such a state? This is considering I am currently not domiciled in any state and will be making this state my home state. [link] [comments] |
What if I paid full for any phone of you’re choice? Posted: 05 Nov 2019 05:59 PM PST So I'm thinking one day, what If I started a company(or pitched the idea to Google) that basically pays full prices for any phone of you're choice in exchange for you watching two 30 second ads followed with 5 quick questions for one calendar year. Would you accept the offer? The fine print You don't actually own the phone until after the year. The company either buys the phone or has an agreement with the carriers. Failure to complete the agreement results in you either returning the phone back and paying a $50 restocking fee plus any damages, or you pay for it outright, maybe you get a discount say 30% off. After a year the phone is yours. You still have to buy and pay for a phone plan with a carrier to have service. The ads are tailored based on your online behavior and interests. This works better if the company doing this is say Google or Facebook. The ad either starts when you power on your phone, try to unlock it, or you can open the app to complete it proactively. The ad is most likely a video ad, with an option to skip/end after 30 seconds, similar to YouTube. After the ad, you'll be asked very quick questions about it. 1 - Name of the company/product 2 - company/product description/category 3 - did you like the video/product 4 - would you buy/recommend to your friends 5 - was this relevant to you? If you are interested in the content presented in the ad, you can click it to learn more or buy xyz. Revenue The revenue model is pretty straight forward. We have a total 730 ads in only one year. We must cover the price of the phone and make money. The idea is to charge advertisers a huge premium since we're guaranteeing you're attention and feedback. For example $20 CPC (cost per click), $10 CPM (cost per million impressions), with a 2% royalty on anything the user purchases. The revenue could be hard but I think it's doable. Many phones cost about $1,000. You only need a handful of clicks to breakeven. The gross revenue target should be $3,000 per device. Partnerships. Because we would theoretically become the reason people upgrade their phones, this should give us enough bargaining power with phone makers and carriers to give us discounts. So the iPhone X at retail may cost $1,300 but we would only pay $900 for it. With apple transition into services and subscriptions, I could see them discounting the phone to us while maintaining high prices. Carriers would be incentives to offer us discounts because it gives them greater opportunities to sell you accessories and phone plans such as unlimited, headphones, insurance, etc. Maybe phone carriers such as T-Mobile kick back $2 from whatever you're paying for your phone plan for a year or 5% whatever you buy while upgrading phones. What do you all think? Could this actually work? It's really expensive, I know. [link] [comments] |
Start-Up Company Owners Talk About the Changes Going on After the Exit Posted: 05 Nov 2019 02:57 AM PST |
Tech Mahindra buys US based media group Born Posted: 05 Nov 2019 08:47 PM PST |
Why appraisals are pointless for most people Posted: 05 Nov 2019 04:02 PM PST |
Would Conflict Of Personal Interests Stop You Doing Business With Someone? Posted: 05 Nov 2019 03:27 PM PST Just a random thought I had spring to mind today. This could be absolutely anything at all such as supporting different football teams, political views etc. I know if you believe strongly or passionately enough about something and someone says something against it things can quickly get heated....but could you put that to one side and do business with them? [link] [comments] |
How do I start to go up against a monopoly? Posted: 05 Nov 2019 04:49 PM PST I'm thinking of trying to start a small vending machine business. But all the near by municipalities are run by one business and they have contracts with all the schools. Also the ones that aren't run by the monopoly are internally ran by the host business. How should I start? [link] [comments] |
Saudi Arabia finally pays WWE for ‘Crown Jewel’ broadcasts Posted: 05 Nov 2019 04:19 AM PST |
AT&T to pay $60 million in settlement for slowing cellphone data on unlimited plans Posted: 05 Nov 2019 11:50 AM PST |
I use to make money only from dividends, chasing large ETF? Am I the only one who was doing this? Posted: 05 Nov 2019 01:29 PM PST |
You are subscribed to email updates from business. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment