Stock Market - Salesforce Will Help Relocate Employees From Texas After Abortion Law

---

• Salesforce Will Help Relocate Employees From Texas After Abortion Law
• ME, sold my stock and running away with a small profit. ��
• ��
• Don’t you think it’s strange we’ve seen a dip in week #3 every month throughout 2021. Anyone got a thesis as to why?
• MMAT CEO INTERVIEW voice on or https://twitter.com/mmatnews/status/1404046107605409794?s=21
• When my trades are not as I would like them to be.
• $ATER MONDAY 09/13 PLAN: SHORTS HAVE MOTHER BAR PROBLEMS PT 2
• Uranium Market Backdrop Explanation and most recent updates!
• Private equities are getting crazier with their debt to pay dividends
• What should an investor who thinks Tesla is overvalued do?
• Next week Earnings
• $CEI "DD" Q´s on Camber Energy
• Peace at home peace in the world. #MMAT
• Why WiSA will take over home theater
• ATER: The best PLAY of the week, triggered Ortex triple short squeeze signal on Thu 09/09 - minimum price target of $50 (c.85% SI and short interest fee at c.100)
• Why the market will crash....

Salesforce Will Help Relocate Employees From Texas After Abortion Law Posted: 11 Sep 2021 12:24 PM PDT submitted by /u/TradingAllIn [link] [comments]

ME, sold my stock and running away with a small profit. �� Posted: 11 Sep 2021 12:33 PM PDT submitted by /u/Rockyturki [link] [comments]

�� Posted: 11 Sep 2021 10:56 AM PDT submitted by /u/TradingAnomaly [link] [comments]

Don’t you think it’s strange we’ve seen a dip in week #3 every month throughout 2021. Anyone got a thesis as to why? Posted: 11 Sep 2021 02:21 PM PDT submitted by /u/Groganog [link] [comments]

MMAT CEO INTERVIEW voice on or https://twitter.com/mmatnews/status/1404046107605409794?s=21 Posted: 11 Sep 2021 05:59 AM PDT submitted by /u/Rockyturki [link] [comments]

When my trades are not as I would like them to be. Posted: 11 Sep 2021 05:47 PM PDT submitted by /u/DrioMarqui [link] [comments]

$ATER MONDAY 09/13 PLAN: SHORTS HAVE MOTHER BAR PROBLEMS PT 2 Posted: 11 Sep 2021 05:14 PM PDT Hopefully, you've studied enough from the prior article to follow. We'll begin, however, with the basics in understanding candles and volume. Think of candles as a fight between SHORTS and BUYERS, and the ending point (CLOSING RANGE=CR) shows who is in control. A CR 40% or more is considered good support by buyers. Volume tells us the strength in a move. For example, if there was an increase +20% but BELOW average volume, the move is not supported and a drop/correction is expected. CONTINUITY is the trend direction. This is found by looking at longer timeframes, which I use the monthly. If the CR is lower than the prior bar, then expect a downtrend and vice versa. Look at volume to see if there is strength supporting the move. $ATER monthly shows a candle above the prior month, CR 80.95% and above average volume. We can clearly see that $ATER is in an uptrend. ALSO, KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS IS ONLY 1 WEEK IN SEPT AND VOLUME HAS ALREADY SURPASSED AUG. THIS IS AN EXPLOSIVE CHANGE IN CHARACTER !! CR = (CLOSE-LOW) / (HIGH / LOW) ​ WEEKLY CR + VOLUME A consolidation can be detected by looking at price action where price remains within a level while the volume dries up. Volume dries up as the number of SELLERS decrease and price remains within a level as BUYERS support the price. $ATER consolidated after a big move in a clear pennant formation before a HUGE inflow of buyers. CONSOLIDATION You should already be familiar with MOTHER BARS and price action breaking the highs and lows of these bars: MOTHER BARS A stock below the 50 day simple moving average (SMA) is generally considered a "sick" stock. $ATER is above the 50SMA. The MA's I use (other traders may differ) are EMA10 (green), EMA21 (yellow), SMA50 (red). NOTICE THAT 1ST BAR BREAKS 50SMA, 2ND CONFIRMS 50SMA BY REBOUND, AND 3RD IS A BREAKOUT. $ATER IS ALIVE AND HEALTHY !! 50SMA BREAKOUT AND CONFIRMATION Let's star off by looking at risk. I'm worried that price may be a little extend and a pullback occurs. How so? Well, $ATER broke out of consolidation and short term resistance and ran above the MA's. Fridays closing range was 51%, which means that sellers were active (possibly from those who bought in the 3's). However, remember that a CR 40% or more is supportive. Bullish indicators to consider is an UPTREND continuity, ABNORMALLY HIGH VOLUME, and a recent EXPLOSIVE CHANGE IN CHARACTER, and 50SMA CONFIRMATION AS SUPPORT. https://preview.redd.it/6l3qdd3dsym71.png?width=1680&format=png&auto=webp&s=eaac2ee441709c1bcc4dc03f54ad78f6c77672ac So, am I worried about a pullback? Obviously, no. Why? $ATER is a YOUNG BULL and volume has been EXTREME. I expect a pullback to result in another consolidation and price continues an upward trajectory afterwards. Short term targets are wide bodied weekly tops SHORT TERM TARGETS Recall from $ATER SHORTS HAVING "MOTHER BAR" PROBLEMS that a signal to either short or long is a break of highs and lows? Let's consider our RISK again. Will $ATER drop -13% to signal those on the sideline to enter the short? Maybe. But will it hold and continue the full -27%? What MA lies there? 50SMA, which has already been CONFIRMED AS SUPPORT (BUYERS STEPPED IN LAST TIME). Thus, the risk/reward leans toward $ATER BULLS https://preview.redd.it/ilxt55bjsym71.png?width=1680&format=png&auto=webp&s=3fac8f1e9749648ad230b89fddb02be2dc9319c7 When using lower timeframes, the information becomes less reliable due to volatility. This is why CONTINUITY is best determined by the monthly chart. Nevertheless, looking closer can give clues about the underlying action and the 4HR chart shows an UPWARD VOLUME which indicates ACCUMULATION. Also, look at the last 4HR candle and notice the WIDE BODY. The accumulation + wide range will be difficult for SHORTS to break the low and signal an attack. 4HR PRICE ACTION Did you miss my post about EMA10+EMA30 CROSS? +28% IN 2 DAYS!! EMA10+EMA30 CROSS The next crossover I'll be watching is the EMA10+EMA50 EMA10+50 CROSSOVER ON WATCH Another potential for price momentum is the POWER OF 3, which is the convergence of MA's to a single point. There are variations but I stick to the MA's mentioned above. The caveat is that this potential has better odds for a BIG move when price is near the convergent point, which $ATER is sitting above. Will continue to watch. POWER OF 3 So, what am I looking for on Monday? The price is a little extended so a pullback may take place. I see an EXPLOSIVE change in character, the 4HR timeframe strong price action, 50SMA has already been confirmed, the volume is at an extreme, and EMA crossover and POWER of 3 remains on watch. The risk/reward leans towards $ATER BULLS. I think a pullback may happen, and if it does, buyers will step in. Last but not lease, keep a watch for the break of short term targets. Once broken, buyers on the sidelines waiting for a signal showing price action is strong may enter and perpetuate momentum. SHORT TERM TARGETS I'LL CLOSE WITH A GENERAL ADVISE WHEN CONSIDERING RISK/REWARD: LOOK FOR CHART PATTERNS THAT MOST PEOPLE CAN RECOGNIZE EASILY AS THEY HAVE THE BEST PROBABILITY OF A GOOD OUTCOME. JUST A QUICK GLANCE AT $ATER ONE CAN SEE THE OBVIOUS TREND. I HOPE THIS HAS HELPED SOME OF YOU OUT THERE UNDERSTAND THE TECHNICALITIES IN PRICE ACTION. YOU CAN APPLY THESE METHODS TO ANY STOCK YOU ARE INVESTED. THANKS FOR READING ! submitted by /u/bctrader06 [link] [comments]

Uranium Market Backdrop Explanation and most recent updates! Posted: 11 Sep 2021 01:51 PM PDT Uranium Supply Squeeze: Articles explain backdrop, mechanism, and forecast for this Squeeze Event Hello All - We have a newly developing supply squeeze for the most precious Renewable Energy Fuel of all: Uranium. Price of Uranium has skyrocketed 30% in the last month and show no signs of slowing down. One company alone by the name of "Sprotts" is responsible for most of the 30% run up. ONE company. Their thesis is simple: buy up all the available uranium - which is in very low supply - and store it until they can force Utilities to buy the fuel at a much higher price. Sprotts has used 300m to bring the spot price from 30 to 40. "Sprott in particular, reports Financial Times, has "snapped up" 6 million pounds of physical uranium, worth about $240 million, over the past couple of months, bringing its total holdings to about 24 million pounds. According to Bloomberg, that's equivalent to about 26% of all uranium sold all around the world in 2020. " "Factor in the 16 million pounds of uranium held by London's Yellow Cake PLC and these two companies alone now have a stranglehold on uranium supply -- controlling about 43% of annual demand. (Although according to Financial Times, that demand is likely to more than double in size through 2030.)" 9/10 SPROTTS ANNOUNCEMENT: They've announced they have 1 Billion in additional funding for more purchases. SPROTTS 2022 PLANS: Sprotts is in talks to list on US stock exchange. Strategy is to issue shares and take the proceed to accumulate even more Uranium. 2022 Listing would be a HUGEEE event These two articles provide good information about this scenario unfolding and why one company alone has been able to move the market for this limited commodity Article from Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/624e3ac6-ffb0-49ee-959f-e59c27e96c80 Article from SP Global https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/uranium-trust-pits-ambitious-investors-against-nuclear-power-industry-66492181 I have traded uranium etfs multiple times for profit - am also holding long term in retirement account submitted by /u/xitsxbrian [link] [comments]

Private equities are getting crazier with their debt to pay dividends Posted: 11 Sep 2021 04:33 PM PDT submitted by /u/SnirD [link] [comments]

What should an investor who thinks Tesla is overvalued do? Posted: 11 Sep 2021 03:46 PM PDT I think the EV sector is going to be extremely competitive, and since Tesla would need roughly 50% market share in the next 5 years to justify its current market cap, I'm thinking about investing heavily in the companies that are going to transition over to electric vehicles. With that being said, I'm not sure which company is in the best position to take market share from Tesla (I guess this is the million dollar question) and was wondering if anybody had advice. I was thinking FORD or GM, but they both have so much debt that it might be hard for them to heavily transition into EV. Apple is going to move into EV's, but I'm already heavily invested in them for other reasons. submitted by /u/MikeTouchedMyDitka [link] [comments]

Next week Earnings Posted: 11 Sep 2021 06:32 AM PDT submitted by /u/carlos_jg [link] [comments]

$CEI "DD" Q´s on Camber Energy Posted: 11 Sep 2021 11:49 AM PDT ​ https://preview.redd.it/bdkrtcuwdxm71.png?width=1902&format=png&auto=webp&s=8ec690dbf6c4f4eac7283bb69bbfa65c8623ab6e I know many are sceptical towards Camber Energy due to sketchy behaviour in the past... Nonetheless, it is sky-rocketing up more than 130% over the last 10 days... in july "an institutional investor" threw 15 mill in the business: https://ir.camber.energy/press-releases/detail/670/camber-energy-announces-15000000-investment-from In Beginning of August they engaged in Simpson-Maxwell Ltd: https://ir.camber.energy/press-releases/detail/672/camber-energy-acquires-majority-interest-in-simson-maxwell And in late august their Q2 finances were anonuced and they actually make money: https://ir.camber.energy/press-releases/detail/673/camber-energys-majority-owned-subsidiary-announces-q2 And also in late august they announced that they aquered the licence for a carbon-capture technology. https://ir.camber.energy/press-releases/detail/674/camber-energy-secures-exclusive-ip-license-for-patented .... So In my view, all very plausible explanations for the up-tick.... Now I know for a fact that I am not a DD ninja so when I look at these announcements and think " Hey! this is actually a value increase that is lasting" I also know that it might be worthwhile to consult the r/Stockmarket collective wisdom .... Waddiya´say out there?? Is $CEI worth the trouble and what´s next? submitted by /u/owdee00 [link] [comments]

Peace at home peace in the world. #MMAT Posted: 11 Sep 2021 12:25 AM PDT submitted by /u/Rockyturki [link] [comments]

Why WiSA will take over home theater Posted: 11 Sep 2021 10:33 AM PDT submitted by /u/TheLosthawk [link] [comments]

ATER: The best PLAY of the week, triggered Ortex triple short squeeze signal on Thu 09/09 - minimum price target of $50 (c.85% SI and short interest fee at c.100) Posted: 11 Sep 2021 02:12 AM PDT submitted by /u/GwadaLuvM0n3y [link] [comments]

Why the market will crash.... Posted: 11 Sep 2021 01:12 PM PDT The source of this information is from YouTuber "epic economist" this is entirely his analysis and what I think deserves more publicity. A remarkable and yet concerning development in the banking sector is signaling the financial system is in big trouble. Severe imbalances between the volume of loans and deposits in all four of the U.S. biggest banks are indicating that the overflow of liquidity issued and pumped into the system by the Federal Reserve over the past 12 months is triggering operational problems for banks and setting the economy up for failure. The loan-to-deposit ratio is a measure of how much money printed by the central bank enters the bank system and how much money is created by private entities, the first being responsible for bad inflation - higher prices for assets and goods, lower growth - and the second by good inflation - boosting economic growth with real money. The largest US bank, JPMorgan, just released its latest earnings report in which it exposed that in the second quarter its total deposits went up by a staggering 23% year-over-year, to $2.3 trillion. On the other hand, the total amount of loans issued by the bank remained flat, at $1.04 trillion. This means that more printed money is making into the financial system than real money is getting out and going into circulation across the economy. Moreover, the report highlighted that this is the second time in history that in the first quarter, JPMorgan recorded 100% more deposits than loans. In other words, the ratio of loans to deposits is now 50%. The last time such sharp imbalances between the volume of loans and deposits occurred was just before the Lehman crisis, so this is a very alarming situation financial analysts have been closely watching. However, for Bank of America, this epic divergence is even worse: Deposits hit a new all-time high of $1.91 trillion, despite the fact that the bank's loans have continuously shrunk at a very alarming, deleveraging pace and are sitting now at $927 billion, roughly $100 billion below their level just before the Lehman crisis. That is to say, Bank of America recorded zero loan growth for the past 12 years, while the bank's deposits have doubled. The same has happened to Citigroup and even Wells Fargo. Simply put, for the past 12 years, only unbacked money was put into circulation. There are two major implications resultant from the collapsing loan-to-deposit ratio. The first is that this ratio is a closely watched metric that measures how much lending a bank is doing when compared to its capacity to lend. The second is actually the most fundamental question in modern fractional reserve banking: "what comes first, loans or deposits"? Put it another way, do private, commercial banks create the money in circulation by first lending it out, or is the central bank the only one responsible for money creation? Deposits are coming first because the money supply has exponentially grown in the past year, and everyone knew that eventually, this money would flood financial markets while also pushing the price of assets, goods, and services to sky-highs. For evidence, just note the recent explosion in consumer prices that readjusted inflation expectations to the highest in 13 years. In essence, the recent loan and deposit data mean that the conventional process of deposit creation via loans is terminally broken. In sum, banks won't have another alternative rather than issuing a massive amount of loans to offset the massive amount of liquidity iniected bv the Fed into the financial issuing a massive amount of loans to offset the massive amount of liquidity injected by the Fed into the financial system. Most importantly, once banks release this huge lending effort the inflation provoked by the Fed's policies will show its Worse effects. Another critical reason why this data is so relevant is that the continued loan destruction is a sign of looming deflation, meaning that prices will stay up while growth will remain flat, so the inflation fueled by the Fed won't serve its purpose of actually stimulating the economy. But even though everyone has been warning the Fed about the flaws of the current policies, it is very likely that once a deflationary period starts to occur, the government will launch another major reflationary mega stimulus, which will also fail to stimulate benign inflation and keep fueling asset and price bubbles across the financial markets and the economy for another 3 to 6 months, in case they haven't already burst. Needless to say, this helicopter money will and once again fail to create benign economic inflation, and every additional liquidity injection will only push us one step closer to uncontrolled asset price hyperinflation as soon as those trillions in newly created printed dollars start flowing right back into the financial market again. We're on the verge of a new era of painful price hikes and a stagnant economy, and we will be incredibly lucky if a catastrophic financial crisis doesn't burst in that process. submitted by /u/griffinhay24 [link] [comments]

You are subscribed to email updates from r/StockMarket - Reddit's Front Page of the Stock Market. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States