Startups Startups – The Essential To Do List (2000 words) |
- Startups – The Essential To Do List (2000 words)
- Anyone here tried building an A+ team based on Ray Dalio's Principles?
- What to do if you google and find 35+ published apps with your idea or even better?
- Just entering the startup world and i have some burning questions i could't find answers to.
- thinking of a separate company for patents
Startups – The Essential To Do List (2000 words) Posted: 30 Nov 2017 01:36 PM PST [ed. note: this comes from a blog post by Basil Peters. I did not write this, and I have no connection with the original author. But I thought it worth sharing here.] Startups – The Essential To Do ListThis post is dedicated to a team of promising young entrepreneurs who asked me recently if they could all just "put some money in a bank account" to launch their startup. I wanted to say 'yes' because I know how much other work they have to do to build a successful company. But instead I had to warn them that there were several essential elements of their corporate structure they had to get right now to maximize their probability of success. This question comes up frequently, so I started this list to help other entrepreneurs ensure they don't miss one of the essential structural components. Why it's not easy to structure a startupStructuring a startup correctly is a challenge. In the early days, companies don't have money to hire excellent lawyers and tax advisors. Startups can't usually attract experienced mentors or advisors. As a result, crucially important elements of the structure often get missed or are done the wrong way. Structuring builds the foundation and the corporate DNAStructuring errors often cause companies to fail. The most heartbreaking examples are when the company continues for several years, often showing great promise, and then the structuring flaws, built in during the startup phase, cause it to collapse. Here's a good analogy - rebar is the network of steel reinforcement bars inside structural concrete. Imagine someone constructing an apartment building. In the early days, there are no renters, so there is no revenue. The builder wants to save as much money as possible until the building is at least partially occupied, so he decides to save money on the foundation by leaving out the rebar - hoping he can come back and add it later. He finishes the building, and from the outside it looks just fine. Tenants start to move in and revenues increase. The builder now has the money to add the rebar to the foundation, but of course, it's no longer possible. But it still looks fine. More tenants move in. The additional weight causes the foundation to crumble and the building to collapse. The reason this is a good analogy is that many of the structural inadequacies in a company are also very difficult to fix after the company is launched - especially if there are external investors. The company will often still look just fine, often for years. But the flaws, like the missing rebar, are still there – genetic defects in the company's DNA. Invisible failure mechanisms that often cause the company to collapse. Structuring problems scare off investorsAs an angel investor, I do due diligence on every aspect of a company before I invest. In the majority of cases, I see serious structural flaws. Experienced angels know how difficult, and expensive, these are to fix. Most of the time, the investors will just go on to look at the next investment opportunity rather than try to help rectify serious structural flaws. In many situations, the investors won't even explain the flaws to the entrepreneurs because even the explanation can be a lot of work, and it's never enjoyable to explain to a group of aspiring entrepreneurs that their company has problems. It would be easy to write an entire book just on the situations I have seen where structuring errors caused companies to flounder or fail completely. But it would depressing to write and not much more fun to read. Instead, in the hopes of helping the next generation of startups avoid these problems, this is a list of the things that are essential for every startup to build into the structure of the company to ensure it has a strong, stable foundation. Startup Structuring To Do ListIn approximate chronological sequence:
Please help complete this listWhen I started this list, I didn't think it would be this long. If you can think of a step I've missed, please send me an email or post a comment, to help out that next generation of entrepreneurs. Thanks. Source: http://www.angelblog.net/Startups_The_Essential_To_Do_List.html [link] [comments] |
Anyone here tried building an A+ team based on Ray Dalio's Principles? Posted: 30 Nov 2017 05:45 AM PST I've been reading Ray Dalio's book Principles: Life and Work of late. It's really inspiring to know how he built a meritocratic culture at Bridgewater Associates by following core principles with a backbone of radical truth and transparency. I'm also reading more about the tools they used to groom a culture of excellence (psychometric tests to understand each member better, baseball cards for each member etc). Has anyone tried similar approaches with your team/startup? Would love to know how it went. [link] [comments] |
What to do if you google and find 35+ published apps with your idea or even better? Posted: 30 Nov 2017 11:04 AM PST Often you have an idea, you talk and search and find there is no popular solution. But then you search deeper and at app store. You find that there are at least 30+ apps that are either exactly what you wanted or sometimes even better. In fact, there are variations that you'd have come to naturally after some progression in your idea. All have some users, but despite being everything that you wanted it to be they're relatively a failure. As nobody really knows about them. At that point how do you determine did the team fail in marketing very badly is user traction inherit problem of the idea does the user base do not have good word of mouth or simply the idea sucks despite how well it has been executed in terms of app. [link] [comments] |
Just entering the startup world and i have some burning questions i could't find answers to. Posted: 30 Nov 2017 08:39 AM PST First of all i am 23 and from Greece. I am web developer with some experience, and my team consists of 3 people. One has a bachelor on management and the other one is currently a CEO of a profitable company. We came up with an idea and have extensively thought pretty much everything (i know we haven't thought really everything but we have been discussing the idea for a long time and we have some experience on the subject). We are thinking of creating an online platform of sorts. We have pretty much zero capital and i would like to avoid resorting to FFF since i don't believe that starting a company with our own money is the way to go, plus it's a sizeable amount we need. We are thinking about talking with VC and angels, but i don't know which one to pick. Which are some common pitfalls people can fall, what's your experience and the problems you came up with. I am using this thread as a way to drain information and experience from people who are currently in the market. I also downloaded some books, like The Lean Startup, The Hard Thing About Hard Things, are there any better suggestions for what i am experiencing? Also any information to deal with the massive amount of information surrounding us? I am in complete chaos as to what i should do first, who to approach, pretty much everything apart from the direction and concept of my platform, any help appreciated EDIT: Is it safe to talk with many investors since my idea is kind of innovative, i am really being secretive about it, even though i read i should not be. What's the right way to approach it? [link] [comments] |
thinking of a separate company for patents Posted: 30 Nov 2017 04:16 AM PST I have a potential investor that is interested in the process patents for an idea that I'm getting off the ground. I'm considering this investor since they would be able to (potentially) front the high cost of filing for said patents. I'm curious if anyone else out there has split off a separate company for holding patents in this manner? The obvious risk I see is that my own startup is ensnared and dependent upon the patents held by this holding corp but perhaps there is a legitimate way to structure the two companies legally so that there isn't any issue? [link] [comments] |
You are subscribed to email updates from Startups - Finding problems and solving them!. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment